R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4641, 7 February 1894, Page 2

R.M. COURT.

d OARTERTON-TUEBDAY. • y T. Hutchison, Esq,, Rlf,) f. Tardtabi-Curterton Rosd Board 7, s F. Stauden.-Cl-iim 8s (Id. Judgment. 'e by default, witb cohts, * James Harvey junr, v, P, MoLaren; ' —For failing to destroy the' rub- . lifts on his property. The da. ® frndant statod Ihat the property wag. ! not . in bis occupation now, hQ. bad ! surrendered bia leasti to the Natives mora than a month ago, Tidjfcf ie formant stated that be property on the 16th ioßt., the defendant's cattle wre '* fag ; there. Defendant. Ootoher last for ,e rabbits;«><'the 'same' propetM and ha\ ut had visikd on differontoccasions since ■ the last coui'iction, and tho rabbits ie had considerably inoroased. To the n Court: The land has beeniwugh 16 the Native Lintl baa not. been sub divided. ,Tbo defeae dant stated that he bed a man • n with dogs and gun since tho poison--11 ing season to destroy the rabbits, but - tho season has been a very favourable J one for the rabbits increasing, His n lease expired last July, but he only removed his stock in December, and j there might have been some stragglers I, left bobind, the place was allunfenced.. n Defendant had a rabbiter on the pro/. )• perty on the 16th of last month, he;; ;e sunt for him to come to Wainuioru > before that dote but he could not find ° his horse and that was the reason why o ' he was there as defendant bad given 0 ' up possession previous to that time, ts The information was dismissed. Ii Same v. same. For failing to de* . stroy the rabbits on his property at if Wainuioru. Fined £lO and coats 95,: it to bo paid in one month from date; " °i J. 0, Reid for allowing his chimney 11 to catch lire was fined Is and costs 2s, James Sexton was oharged that he ' !a did on the 25 th December .last allow r an unlawful game know as the. J ' " Yankee Grab" to be played in his J Hotel on the day mentioned. The 10 aocased pleaded not guilty and was ie dr.'t-'f]. d by Mr; Pownall,' After ; hearing the evidence of the following ■ ir witnesses.:-Peter MoEwen,Joseph 1. Rule, Walter Thorpe; Robt. Darby, ie the Cleik of the Oarterton Lioensing ir district proved the granting of the • license for the Hurunuiorar.gi Hotel- • Ie to James Sexton (the aaoiised) in 0 June last, ' V 11 James Sexton'deposed that he was Jj the holdor of the licence for the Glady stone Hotel. Had held the licence for 18 thirteen years. Remembered the men a coming to the hotel on Christmas - P evening. After they hid been in tho » 8 hotel a short time he heard some loud !" talking in the room where they were, J r he went in and found them playing a " Yankee Grab," He at once stopped a the gamo and told them' that ha id would not allow it, and took the dioe ' I- away, The dice did not belong to the •» house, He served no drinks while 4 they were at play. To Constable Darby: My daughter v serves at the bar sometimes when I it am away. • To the Court: He was sometimes away with his teams in different ' jr parts of the district, and when absent any one of his family who happened j. to be near, attend to the bar when re- ' 0 puired. He did i|ot serve aqyooq" r - with drink lyljilq llie ganje going [® Walter Bnokeridge, horse-trainer. . ie residing at the hotel at Gladgtoae, l e porrflhorated the evidence qf th@ • I, apcused, :t Peter Moljwen recalled, stated that f, Mr Sexton's supplied him with three 1 drinks during the evening. He did r " not supply any drinks on the result of|t the game. The girl supplied tho' , drinks while the game *as going on. y The row was about how some one is threw thedioe. The.information was >f dismissed, A further information . It was laid against James Sexton for * supplying liquor to perßons on Christ* !. niaaday. The accused pleaded guilty to. 5 supplying the liquor, Mr Pownall't lb contention was that they were bom ii Me travellers ss where they resided was over three miles from the Hotel. n Petejr MoEwen, arid Joe Ra^ave evidence, also the' ,i Btated that he knew 11 rupuru station » was bewteen jj and '4 miles,'' ■ ' , h ' py Constable Darby; s])& sfatjpn ■j hands frequently ooiqe'to the Hotel of, l() a for a d Fiaed 40a and costs 13s. j [, A further information was it jaid for ha.vitjg his licensed premise? d open on day. for |l|o oaje. 10 of liquor, By permission of the Court (.hjs ease was withdrawn. j[ James Tioehurst was qbarged with I, failing to contribute towards the sup* o port of his wife and ohild who are' >t residing at Matarawa. »f ' Mr Pownall for complainant, Mr >1 Beard for defendant, j Mary Ticehurat, the wife of defotv 8 dant, deposed that she had been ,t married to her present husband 26 years last September. When they ir were first married she had a 100 acre. 0 seotioo of land and some atook «t 11 Matarawa ivhioli had beeu " her by her relatives. There are aIP j; children, 'three 'at home aid thre& „ aw4y ( the one for whofy} iiipnor'tlS n claimed io 1| yiars of arid'in ill e health end not able to worf, After! |' | yeara.' qf 'married; life 'herjjustiand. .) tefnsfld to give her flop ( jjecesearies, the difereiPs"TiavincH j. gone on ever since, apd lait ||ecen;|)erl 1 Be wpiit (q'liye ffpin hell ) altogether. Thetrotibjeai'osehecaqsQl t witness would not give him the titles I J to the property. After evidence had ! > been heard at sorao length, the case .1 ' was dismissed. I | Thos, Ray r. P. F. Tancred. Claim I I £lßllsßd, Mr Beard for plaintiff, a Mr Acheson for.defen'dant. This was I . a in which the plaiwtifl claimed | tho said amount, the same being fori ; hay and monies advanced for railwayl fares for men and horses belonging to| the defendant, The'account had hWj I panning over'several yeari. ' Ajbertl Lyford, formerly trainer "for P.''#,! Tanored, deptised to' taking h'nrses of I Mr Tancred's to the Porirua races \jM 1888. Mr Itay paid the railway from^Wellington to Rorirqa'and Wellington to Clarevilie fnimen mh{ ■ horse's on behalf of Mr Tpore^' Wi(-1 ness remembered hay being brooghj l frpmßay'ptoTancred's dnring tlie tiniß I he was in the employ of Mr Tanored. I P. F. Tanored deposed that ! he was not certain as to the time when I he got the hay, but he believed it was some 10 years ego, and was not posi< I tive as to who paid the first item in I respect to the, railway fares, . 'I John Macßay deposed that he went I into the service of Mr Tanored in 1885, . I Jampa Farrel was in theempioy,of Mr I Tanored previous to' going toihVe I there. 'H& tiijj 'not Ijay being takeq there, (jijt r (ie l not a}ways at home hay might- hare >1 gone, there in his absence, I John Gravestook,"formerly in: einploy of Mr Tanored, renenberdt I

hay being taken to Tauherenikau by I Mr Patrell, j Judgment was given for £5 6a Bd, t with costs 878, solicitor's fee 425, and a witnesses' expensos 425, i P. P. Tanoredv, Thay, Ray,-A a claim for £24 for US3 nf training coarse., Mr Achesoa appeared for plaintiff and Mr Beard for defendant. John Gravestook gave Borne evidence on behalf of the plaintiff as to the work done by Ur Kay on the course. ' j By the Court; I have had eighteen { years experience in horse training. John Ray deposed that he was in j company with hia father when a con'. t versationlook place with Mr Tancrod in relereno'e to the use of the training t course, when Mr Tancred said that as j had tbe use of In's father's j on former occasion be ( would not mako any "tiled that he was quite certain that iio arrangement [ was made between himself and Mr s Tancrrd as 11 payment for tho use of j the course. „ . deposed that ho r«- E ineroheret! a horse of Mr Ray's beinij | in training on Mr Tancred'3Course»nd ( also that Mr Tanored bad made übo of ,j Mr Ray's course on pre* iousocoasionn, | and that Mr Tancred gave Mr Ray ( permission to train hia horse on ibe t course, fle bad Been Mr Hay's boys working on the course, ploughing and harrowing on several occasions. Tho j obarge for use of tbe training courses | varies according to places. B The plaintiff was nonsuited with , coats lis, witness Gs, Solicitors feo j 83s. s