R.M. COURT.
01ET881OS-XMBDAY, (Before Mr T. Hutchison, R.M.) Anna Christina Neilsoti v, Honry was an assault case. It for complainant, tjojypMHfdleton (instructed by Mr loheson) for defendant. The alleged assault was committed on the 29th August last, Anna Christina Neilson deposed that she wae residing with her daughter at Carterton, and on tho dale mentioned, when she was going to bed, her doe was barking. Hho went out to tmmai was wrong with the dog, Arfloon as she got out of her door a stone was thrown by the defendant, which struck heron the band. Her family has been subjected to previous annoyance by the defendant, Christina Bartlett, daughter of the informant, corroborated the evidence of the informant. By Mr Middletonj—l have not used bad language to the defendant, but he has frequently used had language to my ohildren, Anne Conway, daughter of the last witness, corroborated the evidence previously given. After hearing tbe statement of the defendant a line of 40s and coats was recorded against the defendant.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18930919.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4527, 19 September 1893, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
169R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4527, 19 September 1893, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in