R.M. COURT.
* EKETAHUNA-FRIDAY, I (Beforo Mr T. Hutchison, R.M.). ; Crook v Burke. Claim for goods Supplied, £l lsa lOd, Judgment (or amount with costs. Polling v Fowler. Adjourned judgment summons, Mr Haslett for plaintiff, Mr Jaokson tor defendant. Tho Benoh intimated that in conso> i queoce of what had been said in iho ! case Fowler i Polling, heard at Mee. | , terlon,Jjo had decided to grant n rchfabsf the case heard before ComHMsR.M., the case to be hesrtnlext Court day. McGill v Bright. Claim SA h Cd. Mr Haslelt for plaintiff. Mr Jacksw for dofendant, This was a caso arising out of one heard last Court day* wherein plaintiff slairocd a
set-off from breach of agreement. Defendant slated that woik had been donqjecording to agreement fiirnisheiaPiim. The agreement produced showed that other writing had been addedsince tho agreement had been signed. The plaiutiff was nonsuited with costs.
Thomas v, Thomas. —Application by the wife for a prohibition order against her husband. Tho order was granted; to take effect throughout tho district.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18930916.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4525, 16 September 1893, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4525, 16 September 1893, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in