R.M.COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4458, 30 June 1893, Page 3

R.M.COURT.

1 i I , JefoKfl Mr T. HutthUon, 8.M.) ''d the Court. resinning at 2 jt.iu. I 1* case Killron v. Kami* WbakaI ■ ■■»•■.« the examination of tho plaintiff I ii continued as folinws;— j 1/ Mir Board—Took the transit ,ki Hepaisa on the 7th May, then n* ao arrangement made at any I .id.. i£ep*ta simply asked witneaa 1 v.ikn the boree and train Mm. "_•■•« wad aouia talk about taking iSta -sores aisd towelling him for atuti jur.oss&ibf tha season but no actual r ro..oaith»n was made to witness. V-m B. Buick, and J. Neary, gave tfviJ in aspport of the pkiutilF. jeoc the defence Mr Beard called »* ." ndaat who said th»t before tlio AiLra "r*ae» the hurso Fl&sbouino *3- in charge of a man named Goedin. 11 s e wii no arrangement with Ki'ls*a until after die Afcura Kkoub. <-'» t oSeM the horse to Killeen on wu, ><s for the stud season, Mads no arrangement for Killeen to keen the ul7- > for 80s per week. Witness j i.ujitid making any offer 10 send food j in p yment for the fcorreg kaup. 1} Mr JPowuall: —Wime63 gave the li<i ae to OOodin to trnin for tha '»1 -a Races, and bhw Goo din riding 1 hoi sa a day or so before ILO races. > 1 >r saer ilia faorhe in Kilkeu's '■ 1 ing gi ound. Novw gave the ut nin.- to Killeen.

Emm,i ilimull (Poto) wifa o! stub put iu thu bos butdeclined 10 nniiwcr (bo questionsftnd i.n.ltwVir. ing the bo* said M Slie w»» U'H <* man to wife iifcrmfc boraea." His AVopthVp judgment for pUinliff villi ooata of Court, wad 21a oouniets f««. Robin* v, Mftltaa JUsla. Olaim £H 10a (or altcrntionii to a bviltltug at r l'9 Of a Ore. Mr Beard for j>hiiutiff, Mr Powriall lor dofenduitf-. £4i . had been psi'l on account. for the plaintiff, it «m alleged that the work i wsa doaa to tli« : satisfitotlttrt of (Jo* fehnd*nt. Ih« extr«B ware ordered by, ftfendant mid th* pri«w to the sama i m*t* »gt«rd to. Tiio evidenco ot t!io j jfnintifl and the puinter and briob*«r w«* given tu support. 1 JP«*»ti>»dofeoc<s Hmfm alleged tliat. ►U® wori w| not dona in ut proper in aocoidsnoo I with iind wimfc bad he«i» dona wi» owHHLj, ■ CCba avidenes of John BjHHtehiteot, went to show that jJMflHHpiatioiM hud not b«en esugMHHPT Defendant wWnexi nulled, Mr TV. Xoi'us acting M iiitorpMfor, The door wa not lifted up ■Oil rspslwd, and tbn wind enow through. afterwards. Dafeadsat u»d«rtloo<t tbat tlie extras wmn iaoiod*&ta the contract. His "Worship gsva judgment at «M fejsgtb finding for the plaintiff, for the balance nf the contract priae, witheeggrus on the eviimata of. Mr Ki&g. Coots were allowed plaintiff, Tits <»u>eg Sbiw *■ Bi!lars and Borgatz T Gaatiiecwera . adjourned by sjcaeeatontii aexs Thursday. J. J. smit& t Beaufort. Claim £7 S3 6d judgment soaunoaa. Defeudasfc ms present and admitted bis ability to pay the. claim but said be disputed it andjsbould hnre defended tae setjou but he met t?ith en acci • ion*. Bb intended -*o apply for a ra-l'cariivg i.nd wotaldaakfor an ad- . &a adjeainwant was granted tor that if deit %ot apply lor a rebaarjaaesatime, as order will be

»r (f? dhkkim. t&a&ragri, of Pahia- *>_ &e o*dat- of the "-% £. " BSB S^ l ■**& *«• «t»SlHtg.»a ordef o£tk* Carat bat as Jft-eftfca aiooflßtisaci Wen paid siaca «h(}cWßß<l iha smw till next oouit sfey. John Bjfoadfaeat and Tbomae HieSwßs w*ce ohasgsd under the Wbeal-tywißy-kir, of tha Weirarapa North County, 'with driving Uw» W*ggOiCW with hoiseS when they aro oaly allowed far" wi&b tyres oi a certain width. !& Beard agpe«ed for the proaeeui op, Mr Pownall fjr iefendsate. .•* .?, 3. Moora, Ooaaty Gletk,Mevis<smsa& osrtaia swoons of &» road toe b -]»«? .was wt to be enfcs<-a?i, secsc-a ttete-satioxis wesa metalkd with -s^,!a«ss-1 MrPows*K ; s Sßiit«d that the bylav eo«lsi ossly ottfuSSa in Bflsordiase *a#fe fb%Aj* msSi fcs *s*»«* orfe in aosordaaee wiih «ssSj@s_{|©&Sß«fl2A oft ha CounifesAd'af 38S0. Thealear tweaty- " !>Sslft;jp» bad not.eiajißfd between whicb tha by-law had igggst assJa *n£ conSsnied, Oaiy fcweotyeawa inacL elapsed. Jfurtiier, tlss fey4a,W -Wsa aHra, viree, th« Aot deals wiih regslsiing the width of ho«es. The hf~fwß,&zi tfi* contrary, was made to sitosa & fcmMf both as regarcfo tba sga&bsr a horaes and the nidUi of tj*%s?rsß. •" - , - &.&&<£ st l»sgta, maia- * ' lag tlgss "tibs bj-lsw was in order Wild fee sotaed. Mac fbribse srgmeat, HisWcr-, g%fg &sij itn «r3«&3 se*#m his dt»-1 SH* &»«£&& said he had avideaee I', 3?. JLrft, of ti» tiefej- ' ' Siaiwl's, gays o that i&a A? %U ffchilia Kited tfctfa S?? <s Is WJsSiJht ss th« sssft c< his

, waggon lie aituttaS <« W&a s^4*»m<'ti« , d unuVr ilia sa«a*> bj*iaWo In reply tti tha Bfssefe Mr PwnaH , said tli»t tfeej would &4»att that the tyres were under ilva laekMi I Joo. Tallin, atnpfeyer of Biondbttnt, gava wridmtt ttsai) five horses had b*m driven in his spring 1 liruke oil iiia tUte se£ oat k the information. Mr Pmvn&U itatii 1& tills cJtio iho ol>j ration was that Urnr* «r*>d bo pro vision iQ&da In Ui9 By-1»!T k$ to tho width of iyri'a fui ft vebiele <ita*h by fjvo noraem. Tb« a.tsa sipiitj»4 Fore* man, driver for Mt&sifa Waller Bros., Was auUjacfc to tb« tiamo obji-atioll. In tbs cbSo ngatiist Jnot Hayes, Jno. ftSeOilmont, Inspector of Wheel* tyres, gave evidetiea ib»t on tb* 171' 1 of Juris the defendant wua driving six horses attached to a timber waggon with tiva ii;o'» tyrwt. The Bsuoli decided to reserve jmfgmcnt until next Tiiiirtidsy, ia &II the oases. I