R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4422, 18 May 1893, Page 3

R.M. COURT.

(Bofpre:Mr;T,;flu(chisQii,.B;M.): ■; '. ■ CIYU CA3E3i W, Perry y John Bere, GJairri ; ■M Is 91: Judgmentbydefault with . costs of court, :: . 8, M, George,,v. Frazii.; Claim £l. Jls 6t1., Mr. Ppwnail for.: plaintiff..:. J.iid gmeti t, by : de/aul t. w i th, cos t a. . :; -B.'M--''''G.oprgo.y> ■*)!ph.h'*J'.ißnsoii'pla|'in- -i for. board, refreshment, and horßc- ;: liire, JEB 0e : 64i"~"""'"'' ■ "Mr: Pownall for. plaintiff, Mr. Jack;' ■pop.for defendant,, .'■The'.-defeboo'. set; ■up;yv(iaihattho fitoms: in the. bijl bif-) particulars were.paid for at tbe.time; ; .- aaUiedefendant hai) l Mi whin he.) went to; ftp' lioteUaud spent .tliat; ) amount in five...days,. Judgment. Tor -J f 2 : :23..6 d,. and 'j : .Masterfon- Eqa'i Board Wbite. 'pliuro for unpaid, rates; ).i£7; '■■ 1652.d.' Judgment by.; default with); r cotir.t costs, Wairarftpa Wb County Council v. ;Wm Whitp. ;Claini.for. unpaid;) rates/.£7 Ba. 'sd. Judgment by' :de>;: fault withcourtcdstßi WX.C.A,4 % Kubrick Claim £5 .- :17s 6d. Mr Bu.nny-'for'-plain'tiff com-.'. ■pariy;. Judgment; by., default, .■"•with :coblb, .cpurifielfeD2ls. ■v i ; :-';fr , ; :,;?/:; ' GrpatlicadV. Carey; ; lid andJbdgiri ' arid. ti|f, JPpwp ai)<for' defendant.;. 'Plaihtiff/fltatcMhaWiojefenlant, ■.puiwbea ; ..;h'e :pleaßedj r 'aithda(;h; hot "cdhstantly it her' : hou6erd.urinß'' ; 'th'e : time 'mentioned)-)''s£■■ lOshacl.beeu :paE;v :, y ■■'.'■ :,:j ■■■■'■£.£ t"-0 : ) MrPownali,aaid..the';Tvliole.quea:tibn;. was .whether bis client was called upon; ;tp ; : paygfor )the /; whole time chirgeui a b s no t; V:: perm anen t ; arrango- ! ment to: become a permanent boarder. ) /Walter) stated ' liaV.he.waa. being suedsfor 15/.weeks' first fortnight—only ati Mrs Grcathead's from Saturday till Monday, and sometimes not that;! Had p»id fortho time-he was 'there at the: ratb of;ls each meal and each bed. :■ No Bpccial room was kept for him. : By Mr Bunny": Was only up twice other'than" on Saturdays, -Did not have.the:same room always..; Judgment was.-: given for .three shillings extra washing,,admitted ).by : : defendant. \.?.i' :'. : y.y; : .-J< ■.-v'-'M/. <H,: HOBTBNSEH y.,HEDLEY. ■ ■ : > - Mr Pownall, for tho defendant, moved that the judgment in this case boeet«Bido and anew faoaringgranted. The grounds for this application were that the defendant had a good defence, that he was a half-oaste Native and had not been served with a summons in Maori, and was not awaro of tho i day of hearing. i His Worship said he could not > consider that the defendant was i .unajvaro of tho d»y of hearing, The • case had. bpon adjourned several! f times. ) Mr Pownall said that one of tbo.

principal reasons for asking a re-hear-ing was that Morteusen had given a highly fiagperated account of the proceedings and made out thai lie had been swindled, which was untrue._ Mr Bunny opposed ilio application on behalf of Morieiisen. After hearing argument His Worship dismissed tho application with costs 21s.