R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4400, 22 April 1893, Page 2

R.M. COURT.

MAsrmotr.-FBaur;

(ttefo» Mr IP. HutcM**,B*M.)

Atueoxn Lamsjuy. On resuming at 2 o'clock Mr Jkutsjr recalled the. informant, mb? Stated'that Lh'e'articlos towiiioui ia iha warrent belonged to islm. £ls4i uiHcbme,was foe gist «£ Mg wages, on Uta weekly payia«ut mteM, % Mr Jackeoa : The kiter itmdueed he believed writing of : h'ia -brc- - ■was John 'Bats. Whneai adopted - theaame UXttMj mhm b« x«ia~aAM» bom s ship. He married in the ef Xr«M>y. . , - ' Thia dosed the case for tkn formaat. For the defendant i£ r Jacltsoe /iaid" that there waa~ m a?iden«&<&ba£ the goods were ever in ih'e fcssassion o£ tbe accrued asS hbsequestly the ease most Ml to the g*ooad.. Tbera waaaiso nawijUwe of a eoaatnetive taktag, there was w> eviderwe that bad ia aay-'wajr aiaisted ki'tfae aet et taking the that tbe wife was at ' a«-ay-.the good* frosfc- SmfflßL* Wefimgion with the eeuMat -■ at'-i*. {ormant, * la retily,' Mr Baenv thi v Ckwrt siMk mmim ■ d6ass. , sßa : itoa«im oi; the Tzmif U&m' aacesail . The goeds lMtaK fiMnd l« «h« Immw the aswffikii, was striwtira Immey, ud the Me«*«i wm wbb . m M ssmaaiUisi m eluwiHi, - - aagy.fe aabjs»t at smsi IWa Worship said that he no donbt oa the law beeriag oa'tbia a»w, sad giving fall wekht to aUtiwl M seen ' m ms 9 made m , avideeoe that l»i Mfvm i asMeted at taking, eTsppreettiSg 1 &oy of the goods aiatioo. It wigbt ]m that 0m wile , ft«ilty. of kroesy, h«| disce wm nothing to show that ba£ , a*eisted her. The mvmmS, w««!i therefoce be diseharged. " MUEiGit or tbs simmt tat: 3aoka v. Heckler.—This ms.m In- , formation kid for feilisg i« gi M of iatention to muster sheep, 1 Mr PowcsU for pkintiff, Mr ' m defendant. - ' i %Mi Pownall said that Its woald : ask for the information to be pftiftwM •as had bsen drawa «mt i by the informant, aad was as&sr i tioo 85 in plaee ofat&aM. ~ After hearing srgaiaa&t, ths €&wt , disaiia««d the inforesatios, with ti&sts, i and agreed to bear a fraab . : at ones, ' On the fresh lafoauiien being > «worn, Mr Pownall said the eljesi ef , the Act, undef which the inlocaiaUoa i was laid,' ic wmm mw&sa ia knowing when their aeigfcbsara wsc»" - ! mnstering, so that they eoeld asp a* i tain if their siock got mLced. ' ■ , _ Jamsa Francis HesMer, salkdlw i Mr Pownaii, e&id he was the defe- ' dant in tbo ease. Be wm a s«4iJs? residing at Mangsmahse. ( Mr Beard here objeeted' to the t fendant beingasked ott til# I matter. I After v [ Heckler was allowedtogHwVffu j Percy Jacka, next oaledj Moraaaat, *- > said sheep belonging to f were on se<Aioa 12S, Bioek XI?. S . and witness waa owner of ■ ■■/■ ' the adjoining section. Mr HWtte i did not reside on this setsfioa.™ Thessi [ w«» only abont thirty ehaiaa effcoe. ! mg between them. Bhe«p gst i from one property to the other. The area of Mr EeeHsr*® psddoelc wai l between sixty and seventy a eras. f Bbeep were in the piaddook eb the Ist ! "f March, and wmb salsaanently re» * ' moved. A note was left on his (informant's} doorstep oji tbs 3rd of March stating ;£liat two lambs beloago ing to witnssa wera at ■ defendant's yar«. Uheyards referred to wfesoa Mr two aasl«i away. Had last seen iha l«asbs on bk own property. All sheep, except the tws Ismba, were tnrned out when witnesv reached H«kler ! s. : : HsiJ bs notice of | defendant's intention - to innster or yard his sheep. Prarioaslj Mr Eeckler had givsa pergcssl jooSsoe wren mustering, and since the infoc* mation was laid he had racnved yritt6D HOfjfifl flf -By Mr Beard ; The pt&pmgv oa which witness lived was of himself and his tha sheep belonged to x>sver threatened to niakoit hot for Heekler bocatise be (witbeas) did aot get tha adjoining hig rareseat property. pharles Seymour, laborer, residing at Mangamahoe gave etidaQee that certain property was leased frcm km father by Heckler for: the purpose of fijaziag sheep. Baw Mr Heckler driv« sheep through the gate off the g#pfi'ffa oaJto the road, on. the M March. Mr Beard sahmitted that no'bSsaoe waa diadosad tinder section ■- 66, amd the proseoation must fail; Mr Pownall said that very s&ghk proof waa wqoired, and he thought sttmcient had been shown. James Francis Heckler, igave evidence that he was drivinc sheep on or about thasecrad of March. There was soma ill-feeling expressed b 7 |^ r £acka towards mtnma. ■ Mr Pownall objected to the ®vi- ® aghsid tha By Mr Pbwnall: J>id yon mnskfr sheep on or abcat the 2nd of Marsh, ? Witnesa Am I obliged to aaswaf f •_ HwWoiabip No Ttm is protected torn qaeetioiw.

Mr Poraall oosisus«sd that fea wiboeas must tnnrey &• qowtiotui m m he wu BOW in Uw box. HwWonbip ruled liut the wttaeur a&sd a&i reply. ;■■■'■■:■■ ■: |;-,ilio witaisa objected (»' ihk Wiethe? ha Blustered «2>*«p &a tfc® dst#. in The Aesp nmnLas on the lection were his. Bid aotdesr .what Mi- Sajmour had aaid. Ha lutd \ Md.tb» truth. ' His Worship inflated a fin* ofl« With eostg£2 Bs. ssisAca OFTES mwosmstimsei Sj!»a t. Falcons?. MegSk& Hoe pl*ank£F, Mt: •; Tlsia -ffaa a a flste tha ISEIi 'Metfcn of thsJjapeimdstsg &a&, whieli prsrldeS'llate any aliovdajr my ©fciire, ferfl, ©ercsmtoW *fcWjpt was lu&ctaft ** ~ paaalsy of £2O. iefemssaS MMMrt' a tstoaSOa sud Sack'el acd ilsg ram of dsfossdaat <ss iSw®£So£ jgo4 Itmapmuk 'Utim* thereby dol&g Cojsssga®s£j9 ife^ega.' s&»® SfjkMi pin suites i3w& it ™ "» owrnn of a -?aJt»£sJa fieelt m mh ti Masdi § mh tb« 4o« &jnX2i#£ J'Wf *Uek Mr Mid w» §eiiK§ ; %#* ftw»Bi Sl* MM ."