R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4260, 3 November 1892, Page 3

R.M. COURT.

MASTERTON.-THURSDAY. h (Before Colonel floborts, R,M.) ev CIVIL LIST. J. J. Smith v. Haggen & Co. Claim £2los good supplied. Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Judgment for amount and costs, m J, J, Smith v. Eobert Andrew, tr Claim £2 P» Bd. Mr Pownall for „), plaintiff. Judgment for amount and costs. Same v, Bremubl. Claim £2l6s. Mr I'ownall for plaintiff, Judgment for amount and costs. Same v. Fallnon Brothers,, Claim i £2lss. Judgment with ooßts. J Samev. G.M. Park. Claim £l. »l Judgment with costs. Same v. Jacobsen. Claim £3, Judgment with costs, lis, Saniev.T. A.Garratt, Claim £l. ut Judgment with cost's, 7s, 0 Chamberlain Bros. v. D. Knight. t( Claim £5 Is 8d for goods supplied, Judgment with costs. J. Paytou & Co. v. Charles Hare, Claim £4.17s Od. Judgment with , costs. r Eastwood v, league. Claim £3. .Mr Pownall for plaintiff. Judgment with costs, JUDGMENT SUMMONS. Leahy v Frazi—Claim £l9 on judgment summons. Mr Beard for plaintiff. Tho Court ordered the defendant to bo imprisoned for 14 1 days if the amount is not paid within , ' seven days, 1 Charles Brown vTe Huti—Claim ' wages at tho rate of 15s per week from Ist June to 18th September. Mr 1 Pownall appeared for the plaintiff, ' Charles Brown, laborer, on oath, ' stated that he was working contin- ; ' uously during the period named, Had : ' not received a sixpence of wages. 1 Huki had promised to pay, By Mr Beard;-I was engaged in 1 Mastertouto do all general work at " 15s a week, No one was present when I was engaged. Charles Smith, labourer oi the '". Taueru, knew the plaintiff and the defendant in the present case, Heard Huki promise to give Brown money " by-and-:bye" on one occasion. Also '" saw him give tobacco and matches, and heard defendant telll Brown, it 1 would bo balk Crown. By Mr Beard: I was working for j Haki's son and got my wages after .' some trouble. , This closed the case for the plaintiff. 7* Mr Beard said the'evidence of the ' defendant would show that the plain.3 tiff bad not gone into Huki'B employ .. on the terms stated, but being desti« j.' tuto had been glad to accept his keep I' and tobacco for his services. Defendant and several Maori witnesses gave evidence. His Worship dismissed the case on the ground of insufficient evidenoe of claim.