Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENTARY NOTES.

f BREACH OF PBITOEGE, In replying to questions put yester-j day by Mr Rolleston, the Acting Premier said that the Government had not seen the cable message sent out to His Excellency the Governor in regard to the Legislative Council appointments, nor had thoy received any message on the subject from the Agent-3eneral, Several members—notably Mr G, Hutchison—pointed out that the first part of the Minister's statement was inconsistent with the information given in the first instance byjee Colonial Secretary, that His EifSJency had been recommonded to awept mmmdbj tho advice of the Government, and incompatible with Mr Seddon'a own declaration of the preceding day, that Lord Glasgow "bad placed at the disposal" of Ministers tbo cablegram, which he had received from the Secretary of State. Tho Acting Premier reiterated the assertion that he could not have need the words thus asoribed to him; wheteupon.Bir John Hall, with one of those pleasantly satiric touches for which he has a nimble talent, observed that Mr Seddon'a statement forced them into a most Stressing

dilemma; for—a thing that must surely be imposeible—tbey must either look upon tho Ministerially inspired journal and only reliable paper in Wellington as a mere fallible organ, or as having been euilty of a scandalous breach of privilege in ascribing not to a mere member or ordinary Minister, but to the Acting Premier, wordß which he had not used I That was a matter ot the greatest gravity; and what wero they to do ? Was tho Ministerial and only reliable journal to be branded as unreliable, on tho authority of the Acting Premier himself, or would its editor-in-chief—(A voioo: The Minister of Education) bo summoned to the bar of the House to answer a scandalous breach of privilege 1 Sir John's caustic questions, being unanswerable, were not answered, but tho intelligent reader will doubtless, as ihe House did, appreciate tho pungency of the member for Ellesmero's satire. As a matter of fftct, and of journalistic fairness, we must state that tho words ascribed by our contemporary's reporter to the Acting Premier wero used by that Minister,deny them as thoy may; the testimony of the press gallery is uuaniinou« on this point, and in a matter cf this kind the evidence of a dozen competent pressmen is superior to that ol a thousiind Acting Premiers.-Press.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18920929.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4230, 29 September 1892, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
388

PARLIAMENTARY NOTES. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4230, 29 September 1892, Page 3

PARLIAMENTARY NOTES. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4230, 29 September 1892, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert