R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4177, 28 July 1892, Page 3

R.M. COURT.

MASTERTON-THUESDAY. (Before Colonel Roberts, E,M.) CIVIL OASES, Muir v. Becker and Kummer.—Mr Pownall, for plaintiff, asked that the judgment be given for the half of the amount olaimed against the defendant, Charles Becker, Mr Kummer having paid his Bhare. Judgment for amount claimed (£2 7s) and costs. T. F. Smith v. Kelleher.-Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Claim £2 ss. Judgment, with costs, David Dixon v, Kobert Tato.— Claim £l4 4s for board and lodgings. Judgment with costs. Bellar v. James O'Connor.-Claim for amount of dishonoured promissory note lor £lO ss, duo on 24th December last, Judgment with costs. Emma Russell v. William Badcliffe. -Claim £0 4s for keep of the child of wife of defendant, the child having been placed with Mrs Bussell by defendant, Judgment with costs, GREYTOWN.-WEDNESDAY. (Before Colonel Roberts, 8,M.) D. J. Duff v, D. Taylor application fpr'judgmont summons. After hearing 'evidence on both sides the Bench decided not to make an order, Mr !jW appeared for applicant, 'R, Y. Shearer v. Hqlstead] Claim, £!ll2s Bd, amount of promissory note l npd ?s interest, for goods supplied, Judgment reserved till' noxt Court day, Mr Tate appeared for plaintiff and Mr Middleton for defendant, J. O'Connor v. Ihaka Abraham, judgment summons, Agreed that amount claimed be made payable in two instalments, first in October and balance in January. Mr Izard lor plaintiff and Mr Bathgato for defendant. E, Collier v, J, Gillies, Claim, £3l 15s for splitting posts and rails, &c, MThn sum of £l7 odd had been paid on account for which he had given him credit; Judgment for plaintiff lor f amount olaimed, and £5 18s costs. f Mr Acbeson appeared for plaintiff and Mr Tate for defendant. ■■ G. Jones v Manihera ilaaka. JSoanJ arid lodging stipplied'to defendant, his wife arid'family." Claim £7 ltJa. judgment for plaintiff with .cqstolZs, interpreter's fees 21s, and'solicitor's fees, 21s. Mr Izard for plaintiff, Mr Tato fpr defendant. P. Cameron v G. S. M, MpDermld, a plaim for repairs done to a sulky; 80s. Mr MoDermid stated (hat he did not reoocniße the account claimed, as the repairs were not carried out to his satisfaction; and also objected to interest being added to the amount claimed. Judgment for plaintiff £l, and Court costs 18a,