Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE FACTORIES ACT.

An Important Oase. (By Telegraph.—Press Association,) Wellinotos, Friday. Iu the B.M. Court, the Factory Inspector proceeded against a laundry proprietor for failing to register it as a factory. The defence was that a laundry was not a factory, Mr Kobinson, P.M., overruled the objection and held that washing as a matter of business was a handicralt within the meaniDg of tbe Act, therefore a laundry was a factory. Ultimately judgment was given by consent for Is, Mr Izard, for defendant, stating that tbe faotory depot as well as the defendant were anxious to settle the point, and tbe matter would bejkken the Supreme Court,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18920722.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4172, 22 July 1892, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
107

THE FACTORIES ACT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4172, 22 July 1892, Page 2

THE FACTORIES ACT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4172, 22 July 1892, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert