R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4047, 25 February 1892, Page 2

R.M. COURT.

• MASTERTOfI.-THURSDAY. (Before Messrs A. W. Renall and B. . Boys.J.'sP.) ■':. m oivii, LIST. Several cases which were outsid* the jurisdiotion of tho Court ef justices were enlarged till next sitting, k > Masterton Permanent and Building Society v.Arthnr Cleghorn.—Claim, £l2 9s 7d, upon a uiortgage. Mr Bunny, instructed by Mr Gawith, for phiiniiff, Judgment for the amount claimed, with costs. Ewington.& Bon v. P, O'Dwyer.— Claim, £3 10s. MrPownall for the plaintiffs. Judgment for tho amount claimed, with costs 7s and counsel's fee 21s. 1 Ji. D. Cade v. G. Hayen.—Claim, £7, for damages in the removal of a fence.. Mr Beard far plaintiff, Mr Pownallfor defendant. ,^ John TJ, Cade, sworn, deposed" that ' ho wasin the occupation of certain sections of land in George .street under a memorandum of agreement produced, A fence dividing sections 82 and 84 had been pulled down by mea in the employ of Hayes and removed. Witness occupied section 82 and paid the rates on section 84. Sincethe fence had been pulled down the sections had been overrun by cattle and he estimated his loas at iji,, When he spoke to Hayes about /-«' moving the fence he was subjected ■ to a lot uf abuse, •

By Mr Pownall: The fence was partly erected by Hayes, but witness offered to compensate him for the work done, The fence was taken uu and removed, Witness had cut the' fence, but had hot let the defendant's horses out. Witness had paid nothing towards the election of the fence in dispute, After the hearing. of evidence at some length the plaintiff was nonsuited. W, H. Robins v. M, Moeller,Claim, £6 53 for work done, Mr Pownall for defendant, Judgment for £8 and costs. (Before Col..Roberts, 8.M.) GREYTOWN-WEDNE3DAY. F. Fabian v. J. A. Jury. Claim by judgment Bummons for £lB dis 6d. Judgment given by consent, £5 to be paid by next Saturday, 27th inst,i. balance by 24th April. ■/%£. Mr Pownall appeared for plaintiff, ' J. R; Hebley v, itrs J, Harris. Claim—l6s, goods supplied, Judg« ment for plaintiff, with costs Bs.

Same v. B. A. Butcher, Claim—16b Gd. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs 6s,

Ah C!iong v. Harry Lewis, Assault. After considerable argument tkiPoaao was withdrawn, Mr Tate appeared for plaintiff, Mr Acheson for defendant,

James Harvey v. C.Tully. Breach of Babbit Act, in failing to destroy rabbits, Judgment for plaintiff tor 11 and costs. Mr Bunny for plaintiff, Mr Tate for defendant.