CORRESPONDENCE.
•' (to rn? editor,) Sin,—-I see by figures' in your columns that at {he last meeting of the Hospital Trustees accounts were passed as followsEtoii, £49g|i; Mason, f 8 18s Bd, Now, as I the contractor for drugs and meaW ciues and I should like to know, seeing the liospitalis a public institution, why the smallor patronage is given to the contractor, who is restricted as to price, while the larger patroir age is given to the druggist who is not restricted, Can yon, the Trustees, or any of your readers explain this. Yours, flttf.,. .' ■. H. E, Em
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18920121.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4018, 21 January 1892, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
98CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4018, 21 January 1892, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in