Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT.

CARTERTON.—TUE SD AY.

(Before Colonel Roberts, R.M.)

Civil List

G. A. Fairbrother y 0. Benzie. Claim for dishonored promissory note. Judgment for amount, with costs 21s. James Bayliss v Kahu.— Claim, £4 i)s. Mr Acheson for plaintiff. Judgment for amount, with coats 365, and solicitor's fee 21a. H. Tanored v William Morris. This was a caao heard at last sitting. His Worship declined jurisdiction. Costs were allowed the defendant's counsel, 21s, with Court costs 3s, and witness' expenses Bs. F. Meenken v T. A. Weston. This ease was also heard st last sitting. Plaintiff nonsuited, with costs 15s, witnesses' expenses £2 lie, and solicitor's fee 21s.

James Bayliss t. Isaac Hutana.— Claim, XlO 4s 9d foi goods supplied. Mr Acheson for plaintiff, MrPownall for defendant. Judgment for plaintiff for £1 Os 9d and costs 40s. PICTURKSQUB ATLAS CASH.

Bowerman Bros v. Eli Strawbridgo. Mr Skerrett for plaintiffs, Mr Beard for defendant.

It was stated by counsel for the plaintiff in his opening address that the evidence of Metcalf as ti> the genuineness of che signature had besn taken at Christchurch. (This evidence was pit t in). William Bundle and Donald M'lntyre gave evidence similar to that given in the previous caw. Edward Boddington, accountant at the Union Bank of Australasia at Wellington, gave export evidence as to the handwriting on the order. Thomas Bennett also gave evidence as to the signature. Hhe Bench considered sufficient evidttnee was not forthcoming as to

the legality of the signature to the contract, and the plaintiffs were again non-suited, with costs 3h, witness expenses 10s, and solicitors fee 21s. Leave to appeal was granted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18911118.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3966, 18 November 1891, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
272

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3966, 18 November 1891, Page 2

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3966, 18 November 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert