R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3804, 7 May 1891, Page 2

R.M. COURT.

MASTERTON—THURSDAY.

(Before Colonel Roberts, RM.)

Civil List.

Smith and Hogg vJ. D. M, Stanford.—Claim, £2 5b for advertising. Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Judgment for amount, and costs, 7s. Same v J. W. Tattersall.—Claim, 15s, for advertising. Judgment for amount, and costs 7s. Bank of New South Wales v John Todd.—Claim, £ll 16s. Mr Beard for plaintiff. Judgment for amount, and costß 7s. J. Williams v J. O'Connor.—•

Claim, £l2 6s 6d, for interest and principal due pn dishonored promissory note. Mr Pownall for

plaintiff. Judgment for amount and costs, 21s.

M. Oaaelbeig and Co. vJ. O'Connor.—Claim, £2 Is Bd, Mr Bunny for plaintiff. Judgmeat for amount and costs.

H. Peterson vJ. Kirby.—Claim, £4 14s 2d. Mr Bunny for plaintiff* Judgment for amount, and costs, 7a. H. Peterson v A C Milne,—Claim. £1 10s. Mr Bunny for plaintiff, Judgment for amount and coats, 7s. Same v J. O'Connor.—Claim £1 Bs. Judgment for amount and costs. Some v J. Billington. -Claim, £l, I'Js Cd. Judgment for amount aud costs.

Al. Cuselbeig & Co. v VoigUt and Brascb—Claim, £G 18a Bunny for tho plaintiffs. JudgtiflE. for amouut and costs.

E A Collier v C Pierotti.—Claim, £l7 lis 7d for rabbits supplied. Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Judgment for amount and costs.

J Elley v G Bentley,—Claim—.£o 14s 2d. Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Mr Skipper for defendant. Judgment by confession for amount and costs, G H Pope v James Anderson.— Claim £B. Mr Pownall for plaintiff, and Mr Beard for defendant, who resides in ChristcLurcb.

Mr Beard applied for an adjournment, to allow the evidence for tho defence to be transmitted. Mr Pownall contended that the case should be proceeded with. The ovi. dence should have reached Mastertoa before, as notice bad been given that it was to be heard on April 80th. The Bench granted an adjournment till next Court day. An application from Mr Pownall for costs was not entertained.

James HoariganvD McMullen. Application for a re-hearing, Mr Pownall for plaintiff, Mr Beard for defendant.

Evidence was given by C McKillop as to the conditions under which tho two parties interested erected the dividing fenoe. After hearing argument of counsel the application was refused.with coats. E Beaucbamp v Charles Donellv.— Claim, £sl6s Bd, rent owing. The evidence of the plaintiff was taken. Tho defence will be beard in flake's I ay« v '' ,•-''''