R.M. COURT.
EKET4 HUNA-FRIDAY. (Before Colonel Roberts, 8.M.) D. McGill v Henry Roberts. Mr Gould for plaintiff. Claim £1 12s for board and, lodging.
Plaintiff, sworn, deposed that defendant Doarded with him for thirteen days in January last. Ho claimed at the rate of 10s per week. He had made a claim but got no satisfaction.
By the Bench : He had worked for me part of two days. The board commenced on the 12th January. Eliza McGill, wife of plaintiff, gave evidence as to the defendant hoarding with them, but could noli say when or how long. The defendant claimed a [nonsuit on the ground that the summons did not state particulars. The plaintiff was nonsuited accordingly. Maurice Kelliher v. Patrick O'Gorman. Mr Gould for plaintiff. Claim, £8 Is Gd. The defendant did not appear. Judgment for amount claimed, with Court costs 16s, counsel's fee £ 1 2s, R. H. Wright v, P. Carr. Mr Gould for plaintiff. No appearance of defendant. Plaintiff ackno .vledged receiving a cheque for the amount of tho claim after the service of the summons. Judgment for the plaintiff with costs 7s>.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18910502.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3800, 2 May 1891, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
186R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3800, 2 May 1891, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in