R.M. COURT
SI ACT KltTt )N —T H UKSDA V
{Before W. Loweu it IJ. Uoyd, .J.P's),
In the cross uctions Vile v. J'rnichley and Breuchlcj v Vile jiul-fniont was given for the amount claimed lsGd, and for Brguclilcy .S*J 17 s (Jd.
J. Montgomery v. .(>, Mc( Jill, tjummoiia for L'U Ss. 3fr Bunny farjudginentcvcditov. Ortleroil to Uo paid by SJtli Dtceuibi-r or 1 j iliiya iuiprisonuieiit. 'ihc followiii" L-iiKes wore niiiK:feuded ; Nielisuti v. Jolmslou, JCA 17 ; 9d ; Vo\ric v. Hiirkor fit (Is ; I'ai-.son; v. SnoHitig, betr mid Hluut i h > *2c. Mv Baard for plaintiff mid Mr Aluljison tor defomliint. Cuunsid for dufundtint tliat delivery was not prowd ;mtl nfiev soiuß able argument ■■ nonsiiited witbout coals. . Tho Court tben adj-jurued. j
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18891122.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3367, 22 November 1889, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
122R.M. COURT Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3367, 22 November 1889, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in