STONE v ROLLER MILLING.
; We: copy the- following from-tie ■ 'HagVDaily Times:-Ih : wiling he above subject it is how' as:dearly•;■ as '• 'possible- the:-'; Lifforeilce bSetweeii v f roller" : and'' 'stone" made flour.' f In the first v ilace you might ask wliat kindqf ; lour lias tli'e best'bread-p'roduoing:.-] [utilities. Milling experts of reoog-'{o »aed authority recommend a "sharF jritty" or" lively" flour, and by pro- : iucrag flour of this, nature the'.:' ' glutten" is kept more perfect or is ess broken.'and therefore will make i large and well-risen" loaf, and.by ' eavingtber" germ" in", the flour the iread will be much sweeter.. : Now';'" :his class of flour .can only be made ; where, the " millstones" - are used; : the sanw authority says that where'" iolor is at regardleps of quality Ihere is nothing can .beat the new Fangled' system .of. milling by rolls; The following- T take from the' " Miller's Journal" of January,lßß7: -" When color is aimed at middlings should/always be reduced on rolls, but many .prefer the millstone .when - flavor is the object Bought. Burrs, ■•■ however, cannot do good work unless' thte .middlings are; perfectly clean.; ■•■ The reason that the burrs make sweeter flour is that after the most perfect- purification possible there '' always remains some portion oftjie •';. germ of the•same.size.as the'rniddlings,; and • when' reducpd.on burrs' ft the particles.of germ;arealso re3uoed.il and incorporated ; with: giving' it-sweetness ;: and a somewhat' yellow tinge; : but when reduced on v smooth rolls the germ is flattened out. : and removed in the-subsequent dressy ing,-. In flour that is intended for-, family useythat'whioh is made by the' 1 ' burr is preferable."',.; : '.- 1 - '<-, a* ■< v 1;;Yet the roller niillora say that .the' germshould hot be allowed to: mix with tho flour, as they say it : isnoi fit for human use, and therefore they -, consign it to those humble creatures 1 the pigs, where some., of : the roller '■ ' flour ought to go. They also say that': there are more impurities' (so Called), : or bran particles, in-stone 'flour, on account of the burr having,a sharp,.'; or file, nature. Now, I say lanipre-' pared to prove that the roll has just ■/. as shai'panature as the burr. Can" any of your readers tell me.why. cor/, rugated rolls were invented?. It was simply because they found it' ihrpotrl sible to make flour without stones-or* rolls of a sharp, nature. : .Although our roller millers say';the"germ is not! a fit product for food, yet we have a few firms iirNew. Zealand that are • making what they call "patent. porridge meal," or germina, and they •• say it is excelled by hone (not even • ourfavourite dish of oatmeal porridge) But what is that germinamade from?The name is sufficient to answer the. question.. Jf roller flour is all they claim : tobe, why do bakers use stone flour?' Is it because ifc.'is; cheaper? r No j it is.simply because they cannot': make good bread without it. Asjet roller flour is a novelty or something' new,-'and therefore some people are', fool enough to give a higher price for it. Isay.that it is. a certain-proof that. if roller flour., is' improved when mixed with stone flour,-, the. latter mast be-much superior, 'I do • believe there is not a single baker; New Zealand at'thei present day thag| will bake roller flouralone.in competition with stone flour, Why *is it that there m so many youths in Dunediu to-day more like walking shadows than living beings ? It is.-. simply because 1 they are stuffing themselves with this "starch" or " chalk" regardless of health; They care not what pleases the system, so - long as it pleases the pampercd-up tastes of their eyes.. Ido not profess : to make such white flour hi a stone mill as they do in a roller-mill,' hut - that is no fault of the burr j'itls all '• in the dressing. In a roller mill • they have about twenty, dressing'-. ■' machines, whereas 'in: a stone mill, there is rarely not more than three'.',, But wo do not go in forcolorafeqe—we want something better, .and with s some nourishment in it; something / • that a man could do'a day's work on. '■ The most hpalthjr- pf qur gld man ■ to-day were fed.'on .tybafVf wpijlij';" call very rough "tui)k i er, ,, ;Buo i l) n as:.'.: "porridge" and wholemeal There is no need for us to go to tLf|J| extreme; but it is simple madness t&5 rush to the other, extreme and use stuff that has, most of the. nourish' mentknookedout of it-infect, good. wheat snoHed' "I siy.-Jpfc"' ua ijsd : . wholesome food,- ana/" then wt tfiji ; '■ imve fuller pookets, longer lives', aiiil, , #ortor doctor'p blHg;yr- >v -- : '■• •'■'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18890108.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3098, 8 January 1889, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
755STONE v ROLLER MILLING. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3098, 8 January 1889, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.