R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 3049, 8 November 1888, Page 2

R.M. COURT.

WEDNESDAY, NONEMBER 8111. (Before S, Von Stunier, E'.M.) ..■;■! Breach of By-uwsi . Inspector Ingram v W; • Burnett, driving, without' ; lights after . dark. Fiiicd 5s and' costs 2s, '■ ." Same v Stephen Harding, driving looso horses■.throiiglr the streets. Fined os and 2s costs. J. Knopfli v H; Francis, claim for damages to feuce, £2 10s. Mr .Pownall for plaintiff, In this case (reserved from Carter-. toil.) .His Worship held the Court had no jurisdiction and plaintiff was therefore nonsuited with costs.

Minifio & Co., v Manihora Maaka, claim £1 15s; Adjourned. : Smith and Hogg y W. Corlett, debt £3los. ;■■•■■

Sir Pownall for plaintiffs, Judgcoufessed without notice and allowed with solicitor's feo 10s Cd. .'■. ,; Same v J L.Moffitt, Claim £7l2s 6d. No appearance of dofendaud. Judgment for amount with' Court costs 10s, aud solicitor's fco 21s.

SamoV;A. Steward of' Wellington, claim £2. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for amount with Court, costs 7s. '.;

Sauie.v B, Hughes, claim £2 2s, No appoirance of defendant. Judgment for plaintiff with Court costs 7s. Same v W. Norley Jacobs, claim £'y. No appearanco of .defendant. Judgnicn.t ; foi';anipui)t,.witlills",Cburt costs and solicitor's foe 21s. ;

Same v Daniel Knight,, claim £1 7s,''No appearance, of defendant, Judgment for'amount with Court costs 10s. , ;

SamcvF, O. Mangnusson, olaim &$ 2s, No appearance of dolcudant; Judgment for amount with Court costs 6s.

Same, v Duncan Cameron, claim £5 l§s, No appearance,.of defendant, Judgment for amount claimed with Court costs lis, solicitors fed 21s. Same v Bernard C. Crosby, claim jJdS 2s 1 Bd. Judgment for amount with Court costs Os.

Same v W. H. Patterson, claim £B. No appearance; of defendant. Judgment for amount with' Court costs lis, and solicitor's fee 21s, James Jones v Archibald Camoron junr, claim £6 Os '4d. '-■Nonappearance of defendant, Judgment for amount with costs lis, ' :

Miuilio & Co V George. Oakley, Claim Ll Is Gd. ...No appoaraiico of defendant, Jiulginbnl for amount with costs (is.

John Young v HV fl, Qodfroy, claim £2 Ms Id: No appearanco of defendant.. Judgment for amount Vitliwstsjs,, . , "',;. Samuel Barllettv Frank Parker. Judgment summons Order made to pay at rale of 2s. (Id a week.. .■'■■' -.. ! -' '.'■'.■. ■ : '> : ::

Harcoujt and piniWey v W, A, I', Sutton, claim No appearanco of defendant. Judgment for amount with Court costs 7a.

Same v F. Moiloy, (claim iC3 2s. .No appearanco of defendant, ! Judguient.for amount and Court costs 7s,

r Same v Sir W. Stuart;'Forbes, claim £2 Os Bd.- No appearance of defendant, Judgment for amount wil|h.Coiu;!costs7s,, ; . ,;.;_„< .. .'.; Same v Thomas Jago, claim £3 10s 2d. ;■■ No appearance ofdefendant. Judgment-for pount with' costs' £i ; Vb\:■■'.- ■■■ ■:' :: '~' : "■'. '•VBanibV Hum toHiarojeiantfJCi) : 17a 3d, .o(|^4|il.'

Juflginent.'for amouhfcwitlubsts 21s ' f '^o $k■ ini. nam hdmztfcf. ■ • y■ £j ■'-. John Hainesv Camjerpn, -0;^ tract. at; ; Mangabiie. : confessed v j for(the less £2. is 2d, lieiug at ilie irate of 20s : :y/-;;. ; peii;\veek,» claimed vf££ Msfpet lAyooki'fbeing 'amount ;'•%;;- siipulaled#lienliebomuloiicedwork;' : -£i '■yMx Skipper' for plaintiff, Mr PqwnalL for .defendauL^^^A^^ ; - : '>.i:. : &

"" This case occupied a considerable! : M-;; time ofthe Court,'; ]£ \u -sc' : :' : ' His* Worship'in; said it was evide'iitftlio'deTe«aiiithiid '}■■&■ acted in a very loose way, and if em- v ;^ yi: .ployei's ot labor choose to oarry'onin-': ,;T; 'sucli jifmaujjierj if wasllieVduty|of; ■:;:{--/ 'the Cbuvt'to'proteot'Wkiugtafe, ! he : 'y.: : V would give judgment for the whole of 4> tho ainouut claimed, with costs 225, solicitor's, fee' 21s, and : h witness' expenses 80s;; ; ■:?::;!: i;X:.v