R.M. COURT.
MA STEETON—MONDAY. (Before S. Von Stunner, 8.M.) RIDDIFOKD. V BENNETT. The following judgment whs given given in ibis ewe which was recently heard at FeatUsraton" In this case the Oourt finds that plaintiff was in legal occupation of the property kuownasThe BellSjsituated at Featherston, and that from the effects of a Are lighted by a son of defendant/damage of a more or loss seriousnature wasoocaaioncd to two thirda of the grass and heritage on the said property, whereby the plaintiff lost the full use of the said grass for six months. The yearly rental for the property was £6G per annum, Judgment will he entered up for plaintiff for £22, Court costs £7 7s, solicitor's fee £2 2s, witnesses expenses £7 9s,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18881001.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 3017, 1 October 1888, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 3017, 1 October 1888, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in