R. M.COURT.
MASTERTON, THURSDAY. (Before Mr Von Sturmer,
James Hanley was charged with allowing cows to trespass on the Masterton Hailway line. Mr Beard appeared for the defendant. The offence having been proved, a fine of 20s and costs was inflicted.
George Townsend, for allowing a horse to stray on railway line was fined 5s and costs, J. C. Ingram v. Frederick Baajk—driving vehicle through (Queen-street after, dark, with insufficient lighting. Mr Skipper for the defendant, The Inspectorgave evidence as to defendant having a lantern in his possession, but his" light had gone out." Fined Is ! and costs.
Same v George Butcher—lnfringement of Borough by-laws by driving horses through Queen-street without having obtained' permission. Fined ss, and costs 2s.
Same v. Frederick Woodham, similar offence, fined 6s, and 2s costs. Same v. P.O.,Christiansen—Breach *. of Borough By-laws by failing to register dog. The defendant having since registered, the case was dismissed.
F. G. Moore v, W. Baumber-In-fringement of County by-laws by driving on County roads with wheel tires of less width than required in statutes. The offence haying been proved, a fine of Is and costs was imposed. ~ Same v. Henry Butcher—sinpr offence, fined Is and costs. M. Caselbergv. S. Olsen—Debt £5 6s. Judgement for amount claimed, with costs.
Same v. P. Voigt—Debt M2s Bd. Judgment for amount and costs. A, Selby vF. White—Debt £ll2. Judgment for amount and costs.
W. Sliaw v Edward Minifie—Claim of 9s for hire of gun, Judgment for amount claimed and costs. W. Strattan v George Tait.—Claim £5 for labor done. Defendant was ordered to pay amount in monthly instalments, in default imprisonment in Wellington Gaol, w D. Anderson v E. Lovejoy,—Clailjv 112, being amount of rent due. Mr Bunny for plaintiff, Mr Skipper tor defendant. ,After some considerable discussion as to improvements made by defendant to property, arrangements made regarding rent, etc,, judgment was given , for £G 3s and costs, F. C. Turner v G. Jones.—Claim £7 8s 9d for goods delivered. Wigment for amount and costs. ™
Same v Gurote.—Claim £3l2s 2d. Judgment for amount and costs. Several other cases were settled out of Court.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18880621.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2930, 21 June 1888, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
350R. M.COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2930, 21 June 1888, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.