R.M. COURT.d

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume IX, Issue 2610, 30 May 1887, Page 2

R.M. COURT.d

MASTERTON— \ "1 (Before S. Vos Stcbkbb, 8.M.,)- , DRUHK AHD DIBOMMSWC.T, •_ ~ WUiism Goodwill wiwdbargeti irftfe "i being-drank 'sod disonkdy «t$- ife® - -' Mastwrtoii Bsilwaj- a®4 ~ fined 5s or Swells hours iißpt£isapg»«l^» CIWI. CASRf. Neils Christiansen ▼ Aegsss 3o&*> . 4 sibn. Ql»irofor.Xlo,dfti»«g^ t: lßr||» t destruction of two pigs otj ApiSf i*& at Faratridge. .Mr Braaf -wgpmitAfor .dud Mr Beard far.iMbN* - d»Ut. " - '"■-,-, :,;.Mr- Bsacj in epenipg ihi c««p atatod tbftt en ft« d*t» «»sttMessi &§ - v ; plaintifFa pigs grayed on* to defend»«|% ,' i pretty, wfso Jsilfed them an 4" din-. ; wrote a letter m&emwg plaintiff isFfeat .- I' ho had dtas* The pigs- ware valuables j and the nmoumt efeisaisl wm '*. * coiiisi!dered a fair and ra«aoiMbl*-Qqft.: - : jH« considered, tb«6 dafeadsttii fend - made himself Ikble fop & hiaVj penalty, sm#asked tbetJoaK to p.te -' judgment MjewtoßglyV' •' . to th® 'e&*4* • -. that he had receind two or item tersfrom the defenda.nl im the gabjeeb , ol.pigß straying an his property. ■&?»<. "" was «wirs femes dividing (be-* too properties, ami the pi«s aisle to got through On the sth?April' Se was ' ioforaml ttikfe the defendant had isjifed two ot lib pigs, and on going- ovse foimd that two of his alH&Migincl

"him M9&% -vf lastfitig 'Suit-&uk&1& - -*&£;_ IlitaiJigal i!i« f*o* *fe £B. Tlt« : - rile? bring'!cUlb£ and r mip. «to*ritabio tofcnlw-TSM! af el&em. =- total jto «afc then* but &uml tfesy r »,M Isad to gun ttass to the .:. tar ■ -; ' > . ; dtaigfeter of - -r-#ssS#i|^: m*P - MwKm*:. -*j Ik» tfe© £" <r&e pig* «£ "Imp S»tfe«%H 3|ss£sr ~ l \?\ - ' """".- v * . K . "*M* JforfaaHag -«£ l&e 'Mr j. ssksstes!% «ise iafcssiid. ..- <s£et,ifee£ h® ha,& kilM &«a said Hi€y - :«qaiA.«&fartitk« theas awsy or bsry ■ s It was an ordinary bu»h psd- ;; Ifedfc wises© febsy weirs killed isj and evidence of their having , . jreaisd £&«» gronnd sip. The pigs were -, fesefar gosss to be made aw of.. Mr ". -.Jdhaatott had com plumed of the pigs Hnuiagoß bis property, Aft«r bearing tile evidence of de- -_ -flyadmtt His Worship nonsuited the i pSafertifl*9n the grounds that the pad-' - mok wss legally fenced, sad laid down Is arMfbkl grass, and the impounding Act' of 1884 justifies the fciiling of the , piga for trespassing under the circoraetwoes, , . Mr Banny gave notice of appeal on - £he grounds t but it was not proved to be a Isg»l fence', «nd that the puddock was not laid down in artificial grawj ~,- -wstttia iha weaning of the Act. (Left Silting.)