Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

(Press Association.) ■ Chkistchukch, this day. At the Supreme Court, Pettengell (a boxing man) v Selig and Bird, proprietors of the N.Z, Referee, an action for libel, was lies rd. The alleged libel was contained in an article referring to certain transactions in connection with'a boxing match in which plaintiff was enpaged. A vordict was given for defendants, with costs on the lowest scale,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18860415.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2271, 15 April 1886, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
65

SUPREME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2271, 15 April 1886, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2271, 15 April 1886, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert