Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BUILDERS' GRIEVANCE.

REPLY TO MR-FANNIN;.'': .)' To the Editor. . ' _ Sir,-It is the wish of tho builders j interested in fair play re work brought '!■ out by Mr Geo. Fanuin, that I -reply to. •} his denial of certain facts appearing in my first letter, and as Mr Fannin says i "letthe public judge for themselves" ! ; Firstand foremost the tender of Wrigldb ■>' and Rose is acknowledged as being lowest. On Mr Fannin receiving in. ■ ; tractions from Mr Meredith to privately \ arrange for certain reductions, he fur- • ';■ nishes the items to \Vrigley and Rom, and :' i receives their price .openly. He then i suddenly takes upon himself "to think : that Mr Meredith might, wish to see what \ \ reduction Williams and sarkor would I 'malurbn the same items."- ,;Ho then says j he did not inform Williams and Barkerwhat reductions Wrigley and Rose'had v made; but suffice it to say that Williams and Barker knew they had to compete with-" : Wrigloy and Rose, which is giving one ''; contractor the ad vantage over another, or in other words, throwing tho work into : j their hands, and probably (No, I won't, ' because the bigger the truth, the bigger tho V libel.) On the day tenders closed, I : went to Mr Fannin's office to see ' who was the successful" tenderer, and found Mr Barker and Mr Fannin in earnest conversation, On' my entering, Mr Barker rose to leave, and I asked him if they had got the work,.'.and, although knowing their'tender was not'the' lowest, his reply was " I 'don't know ye£" This, alone is enough to damn the -whole affair "■ in the eyes of a right 1 thinking 'public*. •• Mr Fannin, in fi -ishing liis letter, has the •'■'■ courage (orwhat in: "the colony is generally -■ • termed " front") to say as to the reason* , ' certain contractors do not Under for work '' advertised by me, it concern me riobut aU y ■ as long as twor three competent ntai do so." Alas I poor proprietor. But it is to, be hoped that parties about to build, 'will " ' look at it in a very different vlighfc, and • S have their plans drawn by aifarchitect ,' who has the. confidence of/' the con- J tractors and sub-contractors -in the place, '' to ensure fair, honeat, and; above, board, competition, This it uot the fiht time Mr Fannin has overstepped competent men to place work iutheliande of tho same firm, but, as 1 havo to pay for this space, it is enough for the present. I am, &c, •;..., THOS. WwoiET, Contractor;

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18860116.2.10.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2196, 16 January 1886, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
416

THE BUILDERS' GRIEVANCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2196, 16 January 1886, Page 2

THE BUILDERS' GRIEVANCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VIII, Issue 2196, 16 January 1886, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert