THE MASTERTON PERJURY CASE.
FROM OUR OWN.TORRESrONDKNT., ;■' WeLUNOTOS, iHW^i;,,;: The case against T. E.. Price camion this morning, and up to. two o'clock,; jlne following witnesses had been exaiihed ; for tlie prosecution -if ■ J. J. Freeth deposed to tlie fact of the case of Adams v Price being tried at-Mas-terton, and that Price hadstated on oath that he had never been seen walking with Mary Adams. . ' .ji^ Cross examined by. Mr Shaw witlijP . said he was not led by the think that the. accused wished the Cus|, to believe he had never walked Mary Adams. ';' Constable Healy deposed that he had administered the oath in the usual ws^ In cross examination he stated he did\ W use the-works "In this, case," when, ministering the oath. The Crown prosecutor said the sooner this form of administering the oath was amended the better J. G. Campbell, T. O'Connor, and M. O'Meara gave evidence to the effect .that they had seen Price walking with Mary Adams in different places, The Court then adjourned tcHJßfh.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18850409.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1960, 9 April 1885, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
171THE MASTERTON PERJURY CASE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1960, 9 April 1885, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in