CORRESPONSDENCE.
AN,EXPi,^poir.--,: r .i.. "rrr-vj r'j) • •. Sib.—Since the last meeting pf - tha -Special Settlement Association, I haTfc heard it said thafc-aa' a member of fchfr Exploring Committee Ijdid nut db my ; duty, and to clear- myself I take ihk M. ' vantageof your columns.' On'.fche' Wednes- • day/following ihr appointment- of thr ' Committee we had a meeting, when J $ ■urged the' deaifiibility of startinig,.<to-tlj|® '
Friday following, as I waßhetl,to ; return on the Thursday of the next week, my . own private affairs requiring mo hero. Tho understanding was then como to that a start should bo made on Friday, but in • -consequence of tho exceedingly wet day on tho first of tho year, tho rest of tlns .sjiWty dcpidecTnot to go before Sunday.. being >h§ case, 1 left on Friday'by! Jho coach,' and on Saturday, feeling that was a part of my duty to visit.,the -firaumea Block as per .'instructions, I, . together with Mr W. W. SlcCardle, made that visit, vide my report as published by vou on tho 7th or Bth of this month;. On "Monday morning, the rest of the.party i haying arrived, wo went on together and j inspected the Mangahao, our inspection j lasting for three days, and I returned on j ■ Thursday, well satisfied with the country-! seen, Upon tho return of Mr he and I went into tho matter of a ; report, the result being the one presented I at the last meeting of the Association. ■ • TVliilo in the bush, Mr Reese, Mr Kibble-; ■white,' and myself-- were of opinion thai oould get a block o£ land' i mii< <- iride'by.7 or- 8-biilea long,-suitable for t]\ ; Sqjitoient. However, upon Mr Reese's" j rmp!n,'he explained that there was 8 cer-tain-creek near the Tararua which i:', would, not be desirable; to cross, whic'.i is Bhown on the plan to be' about li to I|. miles from themouth of the Mangahi;o,| nver.: ' : That -b'eing the oaae, we defcided- : '■ to advocate:the selection of a block;* ■ ■ laiid'.about If miles- wide by 12 mii( . ; ! long, as shown by the plan- presented tb" the - Association, ■ -Mr -Reese and myself felt ;that' thef&- could .be no mistake .about tiarMoek, : -andli^'-Mr^ibblowhite'fij-' turned tvith-Mr Reese instead of JwYtk tothe last'hour, Lhave not. theSlightest doubt in my own mind but that; healso would-have-concurred. Sinco my Mtilrn'l-had a eonvcreation ivit-h' Mr Me-' ' <^dlej -and he'says that from information; /• he had received thero Tjraa not more than ' 2Q,000-acres of land available in this -This being considered, and if it is ', decided that the Woodville Association are-to take half, (the block being only 12 '. smilea long), we should have to take a wock.about G miles by- -3, and if our ' choice ii "confined to tho north end I am ijjfein wo shall have to go some distance ■'wb" th'e hills-and there would bo somo . four or five thousand acres unadapted for <syte -i'-S f( dtromon ts. This is my re&ton for piking the assertion that I should prefer* td;witfidfaw : tban to bo coftfined to select frsiffa-blook qf this nature? Howovoi?,.l truat ■'•'wb shall -now go on' smoothly; and tliat'W-wiU'be iii'a position to mak'o eiich representations. to tho Minister as will ■ cause him; to jpnt- the block now iiit-on-ded "to'bo applied fqi\ ■ r . I axa, Job Vile.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18850119.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1892, 19 January 1885, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
534CORRESPONSDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1892, 19 January 1885, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.