Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CRIMINAL SESSIONS. Monday, January 5. (Before His-Honor the Chief Justice.) (From the N.Z. Times.) : The January sittings of the criminal sessions for the Wellington District commenced yesterday at 10 o'clock., Mr Izard appeared as Crown Prosecutor. :

Perry and McKenna's. case. . Edward Perry and Leslie "McKenna were charged with obtaining the sum of--£l6 under pretence of- selling Edward Hornblow a one-sixth.share in: a gold-tearing-ieof,.said .Wairarapa North; - and" which' reef laving : no existence.the one-sixth' jfliare'rwas of no value. Perry' did not answer to his name and McKenna;who.pleaded;not guilty, - was defended "by Mr E.' Shaw. Mr Izard Crown Prosecutor, appeared for the proseEdward Shaw who appeared for Messrs-W. Neill and T. Thompson, of Masterton bondsmen for Edward Perry, applied-that the" bail should-not be estreated, at any; rate, atpresenlQ Hty explained that, the'. accused wjMjpS known to bo in Sydney, and; a "warrant had that .morning ..been, issued.-for; lis... apprehension. „ Therefore he appHed'.that the - • bail should; flot. be ? estreated,;.? 'Mr I 'lzard for the.prtcsecution;objec£editq:tliisr course, and His..Honor;' afterV/short':. refused to grant the applies-tfoh-'-and signed ;the,certifitjate/for. the: •_ estreating of the bail. - .., On the jury being empanelled,-;*---■' . Mr Shaw asked.whetfier His' HoiwiSconsid'efed it in the'interest of this conspirator should be ■tried-ra' the absence of the co-conspirator. ' .'.- His Honor replied that it was mah|f,eatly unfair to allow onemati : to go freefrbiri'' punishment heoause -hispartner ,m- crime * had' leflrthe Country, f ';■;'' ',■»'■"■■'■■■ .. -The case was then proceeded withytMr ■ Izard, having opened the case'for the' prosecution,calledthefollowingevidoiice; ' .-.' ,Roberi Edward Hornblow,;.residing at ' Masterton,"deposed-'that early in-June' - ~Perry .and McKenna- were talking to ; hjnif aboiitthe gold bearing reef they n'a.d;^- J ' covered. Witnesß, ; Wi^, : ''-.WoU, if-any-thing turns out'-pf'it, : share." Perry leit'£piW' of quartz said to Dataken' i fr(mj' ihifcvroei" at the house where ■FitneK?lc4gei -McKenna, a day -or that Perry had taieu'-^n9-&'ponnW-m'to'■ the'concern on payment •of :£SGO down, and^he.remaijidey;to:'comeout of the first aiidi he. would take'witness': in" 1 .a ;sjmilar' consideration, Witness'could nqt;pay £25 down, but agreed;tb pay.£l6.; -Afday or two afterwards witness met the twomen, who showed him several pieces 'ot' quartz said to be taken from thereof, making him a present- of'a-small piepe,; (The piece of quartz being produced;' wife' ness identified it, remarking that the nugget of gold had been knocked off it.) McKenna'also told' witness a day or two later that Perry did not care to take him (Hornblow) in, because O'Connor objected. Eventually, however, they agreed ' to his becoming a partner, and an agreement was drawn "up by Mr Beard, a solicitor at Masterton, embodying the terms mentioned previously by witness. Subsequently;witheas paid..'the..'deposit. agreed upori to' McKenna. " Asked' them many times where the reef was, but ; could get ho farther information than that it was on Maori land, and" finding he could get no'satisfaction, witness even- ' tually threatened to send them a lawyer's letter demanding that the locality be made known to him'or he would prosecute the. accused for false pretences. ' That' threat -was fulfilled;, and .Perry,- after receiving "■ the letter, came to witness and asked him to let the matter stand over for a few days, Witness agreed to this, and a.day or two later Perry told him that MoKehna did . not wish, to make the locality known to witness, However, towards the end of September an arrangement war'made on terms, of which. Perry; and McKenntcame and woke, fitness up;at"ll o'clock one night, and they started for'the reef, arriving on the scene, after a -most ad- ; venturous journey through wild country,- . at about 3 a.m. When-.tltey came neat one of the accused asked witness whether ha heard the water. . Replied thathe did \ and. a little further on they came to a, gully, which MpKennar-aajd was "the place." McKenna got a spade and com', nienced to. dig,... witness having first oautloned him against exposing the seoret by digging too deep. Presently the spade- struck some hard "substance,, which was found to be a boulder glittering (presumably with gold).- Witness remarm. that it looked " rich." ,-" Yes," ■ one 'of the accused replied, "it is the reef itself." - -.Witness 'asked for and received'a pieco of stone, glittering ' with' ■ gold. Asked at the'time whethor ho .Watt' satis-, fied,-. -Witness ropliod that, .he would be. •.more-'satisfied if he could. Bee the reof .'.hi", the-daytimo.. A-party of ...Masterton prospectore told-witness it was a swjndlbf. and went with'him and O'Connor .to t.hj > scene;' Witness then issued-iwarrantfor thr arrest of Perry, and McKenna told him a day afterwards that the„.piece.,of quartz given to witness at the '-'reef "was not knocked off the stone. McKennj subsequently told witnesrthat th.B whoja ■ thing was a fraud-there was'notWng jn , it ; - By Mr Shaw: Knew, gold when he saw it. Was aware that accused had been : ■ prospecting for some-tim'e v previous. Witness with McKenna and Perry,"waited oil i Mr G. Beetham, M.H.R. for the district; , urging him to get a Bill passed through i Parliament facilitating mining "upon Maori land. Mr Beetham replied by [ letter that ho did not think it would be possible that session, O'Connor, Who was i swindled to the same extent,as-witness, L was not prosecuting the accused; ; Cp'ula not say whether. he. (wi.tness), t swore,,at . Masterton that'it had'been igree|'|a should get his money back if ha wa| djflj; i satisfied. Did not a&k for a return : qf tjje t money after he had seen the reefifanA . wlion he found out what the affair was . he would not have taken it b'a'ok,' : When i the warrants were issued' forth'e arreßt p|. i .accused, Mrs McKenna, on'behalf' of hefc " husband, offered '.aii ■ 1.0.U;;' for. ;,'tfce] i amount paid. A man named Kibbleivhits' ! offered-to buy witness out, but thinking' i .he had got a "good'thing,".refused"the' i bargain, ■'' •' .'.',.; 'By the Court; When.witness had paid; ! a part of hismmonet". Perryy t ".Perry told him jiisi; • could Bell his (witnesy) Bhare for £looy i This offer witness declined... :■'■ :....'.i.'7." - The Court at this juncture adjourned* <■ -till 10 a,m, the following "mbrnihg.'" ' i| ' •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18850106.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1881, 6 January 1885, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
970

SUPREME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1881, 6 January 1885, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 1881, 6 January 1885, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert