R.M. COURT.
FEATHERSTON-WEDNESDAY.
(Before H, S. Wardell, R.M.)
John Beel v. W. Burt.—Breach Town Board by-laws by preventing complainant from impounding a horse seized for the purpose of being impounded. Case dismissed. John Beel v. M. B. Cave.—Abusive language, This case arose out of an attempt on the part of the defendant to
prevent complainant impounding some cattle. Some improper language was used during the interview, arid the defendant was fined 20s and 7s costs, John Beel v, W, Buckeridge.Defendand was charged with having allowed a bull, his property, to be at large. Pined 20s and 7s costs,
Defendant was much aggrieved at having to pay the fine as he said the animal was a poor cripple and" not worth the amount of the fine, but the Court informed him that as the minimum penalty had been inflicted he must put up with the consequences of his neglect. There were three civil cases, which were all. adjourned until next sitting on the sth November last.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18841009.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1809, 9 October 1884, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
165R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1809, 9 October 1884, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in