R.M. COURT.
CARTERTON—TUESDAY,
(Before 'Mr ! H: '•¥. "Wardell, R.M.,
andiMr Ooys, J.P.)
James Thompson v Joseph Ingley, Promissory note, £l6. Mr Beard for plaiiitifij Mr Sandilands for defendant, Mr Sandilands' on behalf of defendant, pleaded not indebted, on the ground that the promissory note was given on the distinctunderstanding that it was only to be paid by the defendant under certain conditioug. A letter was put in by the defendant -with a view to strengthen this defence, The Court was occupied for'a considerable time with the xesiilted in a judgment for tlie plaintiff for the amount and costs.
John Gallie v James Dew ; Debt, lis 6d; ■ Judgment-- for plaintiff.
John Bowman v. John Burrow,— Wages £7; Is. Adjourned to next sitting on application 'of plaintiff. Taratahi-Cartertoii Road Board v Maria Watts,—Rates: £1 13s 4d, Judgment for plaintiff. ■. Same v .Hugh McMaster.--Rates £17,48 3d. '';|udgmerit for plaintiff.." . Same v Robert Donald.—Rates 12s 6d. Judgment' for plaintiff;.
Same v Thomas Dew.-^Rate3l3 6 s 6d. Judgment for plaintiff, ■Joseph 0. '.Hayward v Watene Hohepa.—Debt £5 fis, Judgment for plaintiff. ■ Dockeiy and': Smithy IJppera Tihi. —Wages £4012s 5d.-■ Judgment for plaintiff. : " Several cases were either settled out of Court or judgment confessed.
There .was 110 business of importance 011 the list fot hearing at tlio Greytown R.M. Court.
IIASTSKTON—THIS DAY.
(Before H. S. Wakdeix, R.M.)
Jno, L . Myers, charged with being drunk when in charge of a horse in Queen-street. Fined 20s. ■ Jno. O'Neill, charged with drunkenness,and using obscene language. -Defendant pleaded guilty, biit said'it was his first offence and! he was Very sorry for it. '' '
Constable O'Connor proved the charge, and 'the defendant was fined 10s for each offence, or 48.1iours:
■ He was afterwards charged with a breach of the peace with another man named Merles O'Neill, and said lie did not remember anything of the affair. Jefferies, too, pleaded not guilty, Sergeant McArdle asked for an adjournment till Monday next, as his witnesses were not available.'
The Court remanded thoimea till Monday next at 10 o'clock, bail being allowed in one surety oi £s.''
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18840507.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1679, 7 May 1884, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
341R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1679, 7 May 1884, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in