Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPRME COURT.

' CIVIL SITTINGS. Monday, January 28. (Before Mr Justico Richmond,) . FORBES V; WAKELIN. This was,an action to compel specific performance of- a contract to lease a piece of land at'Carterton/ which lease included a power, of purchase, and a mortgage being oyer the property. Mr Chapman was for plaintiff, Mr Izard appearing for.the defendant. The facts appeared to be that E, L, Wakelin, of Carterton, agreed verbally to lease to Sir William a piece of land, with power of purchase at £450 if purchased within two and a half years, or at £soo' if within the next two and a .half years. Sir James Prendergast had a mortgage of £IOOO over this and other property belonging to Mr Wakelin,' and when Sir W, Forbes got a lease drafted tor the mortgagee's consent, Sir James Prendergast declined to consent, Sir W. Forbes ' therefore brought this action to' compel specific performance of the contract ' by Mr Wakelin, There was a question as to whether the tnorgagee's consent had been a preceding condition of the contract, After,some argument between counsel, : it appeared that the only objecting party was the mortgagee. Eventually the mortgagee's , objection was removed by the plaintiff consenting to take a decree, subject to the conditions (1) that the fact of the mortgage should'be shown on the face of the lease, and. (2) that three months notice should be given of intention to. [pay ' off the mortgage. The only remaining question was as to which party should pay costs of this action, Sir W. Forbes, E. L. Wakelin, aud W. G. Beard gave evidence as to the terms of • the verbal agro'ament ; and his Honor allowed £25. to the plaintiff as half the; full costs. The Court adjourned till next day, —N.Z, Times, ' ; •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18840130.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1596, 30 January 1884, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
293

SUPRME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1596, 30 January 1884, Page 2

SUPRME COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 6, Issue 1596, 30 January 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert