R.M. COURT.
EEATHERSTON.-MONDAY.
[Before H, S. Wardell, R.M.]
Edward Orbell v Charles Harris.— Breach of Rabbit Nuisance. Act, 1882. This was charged under tho 10th Section of the Act. Evidence was given byAeent Harvey and Inspector Orbell j to the effect that there wore still rabbits on tho defendant's property at Hautotara. Dofendant stated that he had spent a large sum of money in poisoned grain while for some four months his wages to men employed were at the rate of £l6 a week. His Worship said that he must lino tho dofendant, but under the ciroumBtances he would inflict only the minimum penalty of £o and costs,
An information under iho 9th Section of the Aot against the same defendant was withdrawn. Thero were only three civil cases, In ono the amount claimed and costs were paid into Court. The others were adjourned until next sitting on tho application of the parties,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18831204.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1551, 4 December 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
153R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1551, 4 December 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in