Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.M. COURT.

CARTERTON-WEDNESDAY. [Before H, S.' Warden, R,M. | J. Ingley v. H. Faulkner.-Debt 15s. Judgment for amount, and costs 7s 6d. ' , . ~..,_. Rayner .v. Zabell.-Trespass U. Judgment for L2, and costs L2 15s, On the complaint of James Peters, junior, .W. P. Peters, John Peters, and complainant were ordered to pay 5s per week each tpwards ,-thft,support of James : Peters, senior, ,-arid sannah Peters.' ■■■■■ ■ ■■;;.?' ■■ ' '•;' ::: ,; Ah inebriate' was fined fia and costs first;oflfenoe; r ■:• •.,' *' ■ RABBIT OASES, . J. Brown Tunuiorangi was fined £\ and',costs.for failing to destroy the rabbits on'his property. A similar case, against Naeta Pita was withdrawn. J, O. Ingram, Inspectorp! v Hallavd.~Mbwingh.ori9 to stray, Pinedssand costs./: v '. : " - An inebriate, for-first'offenoe, wag fined 5s and costs. ' A child, six-and-a-half, years of age, named Joseph Laffen, wag committed to the Industrial School, Hi WA*

formerly, apifor-by the late Mrsscamp, who is/'we/jire informed, more often in gaol than anywhere else, sinCß Mrs Quigley's death Mr-'Quiglpy /quni he could not continue charge child, and applied to have it sent to 'the Industrial School., % D. F. Diamjnd.-Debt |il'Mr Bear)J appeared for plaintf, MrJlioklflf for defendants. V ;(• This was a claim for the value of sa,; -1 order for goods' supplied to Messrs Jf* Powell and Archibald, two contractor f/ who were felling bush for defendants. "' The.men had given the order on their-* employers to plaintiff, who 'forwarded v ■ it to Messrs Cattel and'.Diamond for payment. They, however,.'took..no notice of the application, nor did they return fche order, from which Mr McCarthy understood that they accepted it, and sued upon it.-' : Defendants denied having accepted the order, and as plaintiff could not -". prove iheyhad done.so he waanon--suited.

■ 'His Worship .remarked that he" should not allow defendant's costs, as they had acted very wrongly in retaining the order in their possession so long . withoutjntimating that they did not, intend to honor

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18830906.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1476, 6 September 1883, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
303

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1476, 6 September 1883, Page 2

R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 5, Issue 1476, 6 September 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert