PARLIAMENTARY.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1141, 2 August 1882, Page 2

PARLIAMENTARY.

In .the. ; House yestflrday -the nWaßte' Lands Commit toe,- in consequence''of altecatiansimade; inrthestandiiiß ordera'fdf ■ : ,the preyiouß night, 'brought up the-De-' ferr'ed Paynied't-Bettlera' out any recommendation, although: they adjnvjted ha'vipg-iaken V lpsf/»amalile; evidence of), the Bub'jeit.' " •;',"''"".; Sir G.Urby moved thjit the 'f illj-T)e' committed on the 17th.'. '' Y '.■ .':'

'that it bVseht Hack to iheliariai' Cora-'B»iitee:for-tkemloeomplete-tbeir enquiry and to report QMt.- r ~■ , ,-«= -•■,•, V After debate /the 'amendment <i was oariied by 4(5 to' 33."""' "; " A " MrSBDDON-ihen moved tosendall the" oth&r bills back to the committee./- * ? r, Mr ROLItSTON suggested that 'ttwlanl &H be included. VAftH Bonio further debate hb towhi'ph aide of the Heuse was/Veajonmblß for waMin'gUime,. the iHfiiii MajddATfflNßcol said the Opposition had, neither t»bt,. courage, policy, or skill;: andf'fclieii' nominal leader.was a sham—utterly in} capable of a party, ~.: ■ T „ ;;Mr MoKTaqM^Y;repljea/jiddu«in K Mr' : Atkinson of fliscourt'eiiy'aiid'iuault. Ihe, dnljj policy or courage that M'fniswrVTiad' was,tostiok>to their.seats.T ilfjey would,i not havoMUl&Bß'ded inpthal even if it h'ad ; riot; been for thd/Idisitehriatibtiwifi-.tlie'i (House to turn .Mr'Bryce out>> rjHe,.was ; jn f ojt himself bo young as hebhcewaa, but l > when he was insulted he could find4an~ igugge or. ; any^ing ) ihinuelf' there woJ . i ;- ; "^^-; v .'.-' r | 'Afiersome further debate the-wnoiew Jhe bills were referred baok to the comjmitte'e. - : ' t" '■■,■■', j A disousaion on the report of th'6jOoin- k pi.ittee on and c Eiic¥tor/ Agency. OompWa Bill'Waa interrupted py>the dinner adjournment. ' | ,;At .thTefenihirsirtiog the HoOSjoT AraiN.?oifimo/ed .that the into pominittee,. to • conßider-introduotion c of,North'lsland::K[aw, Trunk -ItailwayiLdari. Payment of Members Bill v . . .| -Mr' MoNxiwitEßY" sai'd^iie''would?not' .oppose the introduction of Bills, but his tjot doinK bo was'(.nbt^'be.;taken fflm( 'volvihfi acquiescent in the principle- J - > '■•:! MrMAOANDiEW objected to there-being. ;twoloan bills..' ' . ,'•■ u^-^/ v {..Major Atkinson promised,to uive.Mr, 'Montgomery a full,oppbrtunity-Mflwouia'. # e financial prqpoaals.Df'the Government tydgo into supply before these Bills came | pit for their sedond reading: ;Replyiaglo Mr Hu|hiß(s'nThe. iine'hjid eve/ been. surveyed, io'r Stay,Mam'Nofth Trunk,line been made. •"., ,The Billdtwere 'irttrodncelalilread'a prßt.tuae. ■/• . . "..'. .".," ' p ];_' '..-; fJTh'e Supreme Court Bill Wreal a' second time.Bfter Weston, Connolly, and BUbgate had supported, being a raluable step in legal reform, .. The Court of d■miofrßill,-and Criminal 1m Bill; were aUreadaseoondtime. • ..'

••!Th.fl. Industrial. Schools Bill ; waa oun altered in oommitt'ee and/reported with' anjendments, The Imbedfe-Passengers i-BiJl, Fisheries Bill, Inspection of Mabiiinf'S Bill, Oompauiea Bill, Auckland Onivetsitjr College Bill, and the Railways ..Qoiiatruotion'and Land Aot Amendment' <Biila were all read.a, seqo'ad tim'e._ s ~ ~., iU On the motion to.goimo. committee <iii the-Licensing let' Amendment Bill,' Mr Stevens moved that thejbill and all the proposed amendments should'be referred bo ft select committee. After disouißion this amendment was rejeoted by 42 to 38, aud the motion to go into oommittee was •earnedby 61 to 25. "In committee an .amendment by Mr'Siitton'to makeJhe local bodies the liceuaing..committeei-;waa carried by 82 to 31. A 'long disoussion ensued on clause 3 and certain Hamendi ritente were proposed by Mr Weston, i Ultimately progress was reportediwitkut aiiy/deoisioii having been 'come to. The' House rose at 12.35 .'•",'/7 ]?,'!'s