DOG REGISTRATION.
■ ■» To thb Editor. Sir,—Tour note to my letter in your paper of yesterday does not appear to touch the real question at issue. Granted that " The Dog Registration Act, 1880," is an "Ant to compel registration,"'the samo Act, clause 22, declares that " nothing in this Act contained shall derogate from the provisions of any Act for the time being? in force in relation to tho rabbit nuisance" The point seems to be this—A County Council (or other local authority)oannot use the permissive power granted to it by the Dog Registration Aot Amendment Act, 1881, to deviate in any way from the provisions of the Act of 1880 except by some regulation of its own, but no such regulation can have the force of latr if it contravenes the Rabbit Nuisance Aot. lam.ifc, J. Valehtihb Smith.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18820315.2.8.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1023, 15 March 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
137DOG REGISTRATION. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 4, Issue 1023, 15 March 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in