R.M. COURT.
FEATHERSTON-MOND^I.!'• [Before H. S. Wardbll,Esq.;-J|MJ. - W. A, P,Sutton v"0. and E. Harris.Breach of Sheep Act, 1878. ■■ 'Fined £o and costs. .'. ••'- Constable Brunskill v J. W. JLairnbeer.--Breach of Public Works Act,lß7Bj'Sec-., tion 99—by tethering a horse'opthe'rgad,/ Fined6aand coats. :;•■;• H,O.Dowroaii v W. Harrison.—Breach : of Public Works Act, 1876, Seotiou /r 99, sub-section 9. Obstructing a road' ; by leaving a dray standing tliereou.'.f Fined 20s and costs. .','■'• . Same v Same. This was a charge p£ .a Bimilar nature, but thn Eesideht Magistrate did not consider the evidence would, justify a conviotiou and;dismissed the 'information. H. 0. Dowman v W. Harrison —Claim 3d. This was. a claim for a refund of 3d overcharge 'in toll'upon a horse taken through the toll-gate at Waiheiiga.. .;..;; Mr Bunny npoearcd for the defendant, and pleaded that the horse was liable to: full toll as he was "attached" to the . vehicle, although only by a rope at the" back of the vehicle. Plaintiff urged that as it was only being led it was only liable to half toll. Judgment was given for the plaintiff for amount-claimed and costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18820117.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 976, 17 January 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
181R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 976, 17 January 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in