Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

! featherstomilonday. .V .. .aniongo wv.'-m rv^•.i d! ' v|. G.,Petherick:v Warden-Debt Ll2lMdi'iNo appearance of-flefepdant,') Judgment for amount'and Ll;9s coito;'\- . F. (1. Patliericlc.VC.W. R. Bnttnfr^.-

Debt Ll3 9d. Judgment for amount a'tiil costs LI 9d, ! ■ V: ■!?-:■J|' F. G, Petherick'v Debt LU Gd; and »t.ui3.. v \ifgsl J.W.Smith sued' Donald and' Peter! MoLaren, W. McLeod, W. Wratten, and 0. Harris, but the oases]were, withdraw*

'• SHEEP CASE,W A, P. Sutton .Y.-Charle^'Harris,^. 'in driving sheep across a property without giving notice. . Mr Beard appeared for defendant," who. .pleaded not guilty. * - j •\Th^Sse".had ; sfa brought forward on' if, 'Martin .jun,, to •SiießpilftßpectwDnlmmond~that defendant -had ...driven sheep across his land without giving notice of his intention to do-so. Mr/Drummond-had-reported the, affair to Mr Su'itoVjfand afcti.on',<; T. Mar£in,~jun., 'deposed that he had" ffotQftc4iv.ed'<Ta'i personal notice, but understood' 1 fertheipherd had received, noticp™ the shßep'hai'bVen'"driven adross his land, as he had-not see/i themjso driven". ,--x x|rj i j There being v n6 otjher witnfisjiesjorjttfo Mr Sutton stated to the Gourt that. ho hadlbroughfc this case forward chiefly to show that it was intended "atri'ctly To" eiifo"rce tlie"iHauae"*6f the Act ■tinder, which it jwas laid, Advertisements to this effect" had'" been published, but he noticedjthat.people still drpje' ( ;ciut giving noticd; to\ the owners! of j>rp-j p"?rty' through" which' they "intended to .pass,. and..thia—practice- -he-intended to stop. ~, thankV pf-aheeppwnersiforen forcing. ;t hi s" claua b; bqfcin present qase there .was nptsuffl', : cieot evidence to shew that the Bheep-had ibeeft driyen as alleged,: and he was'there? fore compelled to dismiss the information. K'-M'fe i'-wO'iG -d"

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18810607.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 787, 7 June 1881, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
256

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 787, 7 June 1881, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume 3, Issue 787, 7 June 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert