The Coningham Divorce Case.
Sydney, M arch .11. The second hearing of the suit by which Arthur Goninghan seeks divorce from his wife on the ground of htr .adultery with the Rev. Dr, O’Harui was opened to day. March 12 The cross examination of Goning'nam lasted the greater part of the day.
At the conclusion of the examination and in answer to Mr Want’s statement that he would show the Judge and jury that the whole ease was conspiracy, the petitioner said that letters alleged to have passed between him and the respondent since the last trial, and which had been put in as evidence, had been forgeries, and he would prove forgery, perjury, seduction, and very nearly murder. The petitioner called the respondent, whose exarninaiiun was not finished whoa the Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19010314.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 123, 14 March 1901, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
133The Coningham Divorce Case. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 123, 14 March 1901, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in