Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Stoke School Cases. Wellington, November 23.

The Stoko case was continued to-day. James Sedan, otherwise Brother Killjan, giving evidence on his own behalf, said he had struck Davis on one occasion, as the boy had misbehaved d,ui-ing prayers. The usual weapon of punishment at the 9ohool was a supplejack. If any boy refused to hold his hand out he was struck qu tUa back jaud lega till he did so. Cross-examined by the Crown Proaeeotor, witness said he waa th« peifson who administered punishment to the boys in the cells with a stick. While the boys were locked in the colls they were taken out on successive days and | caned with a supplejack by him. Do you say that was not cruel treatment ? — I did not believe it was cruel then. What do you say now ? — I do not believe it was. What was the longest period for j which a boy was impriboned in the cells ?-— I do not know. Have, any boys been in tba cells for a month ? — I heard a boy wag there^. I beard at the time of the Comrqission that a boy was imprisQned for two months. What is your own knowledge ? — I cannot swear as to the time. Please give me an answer, — I know a boy was imprisoned for three or four weeks. How many times did you use the supplejack on him ? — Not more than on three or four occasions. How many strokes did you give him each time ? —Four to si». In answer to further questions, witness denied having used his fist to strike Davis, and contradicted a suggestion that a boy named McManimin had been taken from the cells and caned on fovu- successive days, Jsoys had been imprisoned, in cells under the direction of the head teacher, Brother Loetus. The jury retired at £.88 p.m., and in less than ten minutes they came back with a verdict of " not guilty." Accused was discharged, and bail continued on the other charges against him, concerning which tbe Crowo Prosecutor will make a statement on Monday,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19001127.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 77, 27 November 1900, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
345

Stoke School Cases. Wellington, November 23. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 77, 27 November 1900, Page 3

Stoke School Cases. Wellington, November 23. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 77, 27 November 1900, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert