BOROUGH BY-LAWS.
TO THE EDITOR. Sir, — It ia very amusing to read your report of last Borough Council meeting, when several councillors *x* pressed ehe opinion regardiug the bylaw on buildings in the innar ar«a, that it \v,\s "too strict." When was this ' discov»ry made, seeing that in a j former idsua the report of tbo prerioui j meeting showed the council wero unanimous in deciding that the Co op. should be pro3ecut«d ? Why this change ? Have they come to their , latent published opinion in order to justify themselves for not prosecuting - a worse offender ? I should like to make a few remarks on th« casa against the Co-op., taking for. xn y text . the profound legal inasiiu "Two blacks don't make one white,' 1 but, a» ; an eminent loonl L^timst would say, ' the case being sub rosa, rauna esl verbuna. — I am, etc. Lignum Fbrrumquk.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDA19000728.2.11.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 24, 28 July 1900, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
146BOROUGH BY-LAWS. Waimate Daily Advertiser, Volume III, Issue 24, 28 July 1900, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in