Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DISRESPECTFUL M.L.C.

Per Press Association

In <sritioising the Australian and New Zealand Naval Defence Bill yesterday, the Hon. Rigg took 'occasion to refer to the British. Government as a " disreputable " Government. Being ruled out of order by the Speaker, 'he challenged the ruling. When the Legislative Council met this morning the Hon. Rigg moved that the Speaker's ruling was an infringement of the privileges of a meni>ber of the Council. In -moving thas motion the Hon. Rigg recalled an incident last year when he was not permitted to refer to the Chinese labour in South Africa as " slavery." This was ithe second time that he had had to disagree with the Speaker's ruling. That ruling would prevent members from commenting in a hostile manner on the Brit:sh Government. This was a serious question. There was no greater privilege than free speech, and if "this was to be curtailed in our Legislature we might expect the country to be subjected to a serious tyranny. He only hoped that what he iiad said that day would emphasize the necessity of free speech. The Hon. Cairneross seconded the motion, as he believed that the Hon. Rigg was (juite within his rights. At the same time he disagreed entirely and absolutely with views expressed by the Hon. Rigg. The Hon. Pitt, while deprecating any attempt to interfere with speech, argued that it was improper to refer to the Imperial Government in offensive terms. The Hon. Rigg should be permitted to criticise that Government to the fullest extent, but it should be criticised in respectful terms. The Hon. Miller said that whether the word was disrespectful or not the Speakers-ruling should be obeyed. The Hon. Rigg said he had not intended to call for a division, but to let the motion go on the voices. After the Attorney-General's attitude, however, he would insist on a division.

The motion was lost by 21 votes to

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19051030.2.46

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume XLIX, Issue 12640, 30 October 1905, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
320

A DISRESPECTFUL M.L.C. Wanganui Chronicle, Volume XLIX, Issue 12640, 30 October 1905, Page 8

A DISRESPECTFUL M.L.C. Wanganui Chronicle, Volume XLIX, Issue 12640, 30 October 1905, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert