Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PACIFIC STRATEGY

SPECULATION IN LONDON j & UNITED STATES. NEED OF GOOD UNDERSTANDING WITH RUSSIA. NEW YORK, August 12. “According to the best opinion in London, the latest meeting of Messrs. Churchill and Roosevelt will be regarded in future as the ‘Pacific Conference,,” says the “New York Times” correspondent in London. “That does not mean that the problems of the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and Europe will not be discussed, but whereas in the past the Pacific has been relegated of necessity to the remote future, this time the problems of the strategic means of defeating Japan will have a highei - place on the agenda than ever before.”

The Washington correspondent of the “New York Times” says that after the meeting of the Pacific War Council the spokesman said that the discussions had been entirely devoted to future military strategy. The correspondent adds that hopeful officials in Washington are looking for an early end to the war. They speculated that the meeting of Messrs. Churchill and Roosevelt would result in the final decision for a blow that might knock out the European Axis. “The number and importance of service chiefs accompanying Mr Churchill indicate that the talks will not be entirely political,” says the “New York Times” ,in an editorial, “but it is obvious that the Prime Minister and the President must address themselves primarily to political problems, which have been made importunate not only by the course of the war and by the lack of understanding among people, but also by the failure of inter-Allied diplomacy to agree on the questions confronting us. That is why Russia’s absence is particularly unfortunate. "Without Russia’s participation the final answers cannot be given.” Mr Hanson Baldwin, commenting on Russia’s absence, says in the “New York Times:” The Soviet is clearly suspicious about the British and American intentions. Conversely, there is a growing suspicion in America of Russia's motive. Hitler hopes to turn those suspicions into a serious cleavage, but even if Hitler’s hopes are dashed there is a grave danger of the great game of power politics becoming the sole rule for Europe before the war ends, unless a better understanding is reached with Russia.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19430813.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 August 1943, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

PACIFIC STRATEGY Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 August 1943, Page 3

PACIFIC STRATEGY Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 August 1943, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert