OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS

Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1942, Page 4

OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS

A NEW ST. MATTHEW’S (To the Editor.) Sir,—lf your anonymous correspondent Lux keeps on writing under fresh captions every time he uses your columns the original subject under discussion will soon be lost sight of. However, his lengthy Biblical quotation should justify me in calling his leisured attention to another which might have escaped his notice but in his case is as much to the point: Acts 20, vs. 28-3 L Although a well-wisher to each and every place of worship in which tne Gospel is preached, these for the moment are not a matter for rebuilding, as is the case of the ruined church. Only as one whose pioneer family connection with the records of St. Matthew’s extends to first decade of its since all-gloried time-to-time community progress —and not at Vestry or other behest —have I used your columns as aforetime in making more widely known some of its historic records, soon likely, otherwise, to have found that same oblivion to which both church and man either deserve or become heirs to. If Lux has higher claims than these to champion other aspects of religious life in the community, then the chance for him to battle on alone has perhaps been 1 made unduly clear. On the other hand, I have enjoyed reading the letter of his contemporary no-de-plumist, “Not An Anglican, very much indeed. —I am, etc., Masterton, July 31. THE QUESTION OF SITE (To the Editor) Sir,—As N.J.B. began this correspondence, perhaps it would be well for him to have the final word and this to go to the W.P.8., but I must say how astonished I have been at the kindly words of agreement, both over the telephone, and face to face, I have received from people who are not Church of England. All who love the town must long to see an open green lawn with a beautiful church where now are dingy grey stucco buildings. I know that questions of finance and legal difficulties may loom large in the eyes of the Vestry, but I would ask them to remember two things: “Where there is no vision the people perish, ’ and also, “If an act is right we can safely leave the results to God.” Surely it is right to put God’s House on the land which was consecrated to Him nearly 100 years ago. As for “Lux,” who says I live in another world, I would be sorry to have to live in his, which is so despondent and bitter. Cheer up “Lux.” Perhaps if there is more Christianity there will be more charity when the next depression comes. As for the gentleman who objected to the elocution in church, I have a sneaking sympathy with him, but perhaps others might object to the way he and I speak, so we must bear with each other’s little ways. Now for Mr Wardell’s objection to the colours used in church uniforms or vestments: Gold has always been used since the time of Aaron and it is rather bovine to object to scarlet—a red rag to a bull. The final objection is: “Don’t build churches—get on with the war.” I am one of those who believe that the Axis forces will be beaten, but not by the Allies! When we are ready by repentance and amendment of life to ask as a nation His help, God Himself will conquer evil and destroy the enemy. How it is not for me to say. Of course we must do our share, but if anyone is interested enough to read the third verse of the thirty-first chapter of Deuteronomy, he will understand and I think, take comfort. — Thanking you for your courtesy.—l am, etc., ANNE FLETCHER. Masterton, July 31.