Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISPUTED ACCOUNT

DEFENDED CIVIL ACTION. BRUSH BETWEEN MAGISTRATE AND DEFENDANT. In a defended civil action heard in the Masterton Magistrate's Court this morning. G. Malmo Ltd. sued C. H. Lethaby for £29 12s. Mr H. P. Lawry. S.M., gave judgment for plaintiff for £26 12s with £5 Is costs. Mr S. V. Gooding, who appeared for Messrs Malmo Ltd., stated that the case had been adjourned by arrangement a month ago. i Mr Lawry: "You should h’ave had the consent of the court." Proceedings became somewhat heated in the initial stages of the case. Mr Lethaby stated that he challenged the amount charged. Mr Lawry pointed out that defendant should have filed notice of defence when he received the summons. Mr Lethaby offered the Magistrate the cost cf the adjournment. “Who do you think you are to talk to me like that?" asked Mr Lawry. He threatened to stand Lethaby down for contempt cf Court and ordered him to sit down and "cool off." "Now that you have come to your senses we will proceed with the case," said Mr Lawry. after a lapse cf a few minute’. Mr Good’ng stated that the claim was for repairs made 'to Lethaby’s truck come limo ago. A quotation cf £27 was given for the work. With Mr Lotimby's commit. additional repair.:, making a total coat of £37 3s. were carried cut. The sum of £29 12s, which was sued for. was the balance owing bv Mr Lethaby. In questioning Mr C. N. C. Malmo. Mr Lethaby, who conducted his own defence, set out to check the lime charts for the job. Mr Malmo admitted that the offi-o s'o'fi' had made an overcharge c f £2 19s fid. Mr Lethaby alleged that .hero had been bad w nkmt'nship cm m: ruck He had complained since th. job had been completed. Mr Lowry gran'ed a request by Mr Goodins to have his cl' .:' -'e Tied io refute allegation:: cl bad workmanship. Mr Malmo gave evidence cf a technical nature. Mr Lowry, in giving judgment for Plai’ititf tor £23 H’s with costs £5 Is. observed that to defendant content:.ms ■:.o::'d savour cf ;’.:a md.cu-

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19410605.2.81

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 5 June 1941, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
359

DISPUTED ACCOUNT Wairarapa Times-Age, 5 June 1941, Page 6

DISPUTED ACCOUNT Wairarapa Times-Age, 5 June 1941, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert