Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SECURITY AT SEA

i.Continued from page

“The United States has been success-i ful in maintaining the Monroe Doc-I trine, till the United Slates has progressed from weakness to strength, and ' the other nations in this hemisphere have been enabled to develop their' own civilisations free from the fear of i sudden foreign conquest, only because ■ of the support of Britain, whose fleet ] could prevent overseas aggression from 1 Europe. I JAPANESE AGGRESSION. “Only during the past 50 years has ; it become necessary for us to develop! a strong navy." Colonel Kr.ox con-j tinned. “The circumstances that rendered a strong navy essential to our] safety were the construction of the German navy to back aggression to-' ward distant lands, and Japan’s ex-, pansion into peaceful lands beyond her I borders. “Ail will doubtless remember that j the/Great War gave Japan her chance ; for expansion throughout the islands: of the Pacific, and will remember that I this was the occasion of her 'Twenty- i One Demands on China. We were; able to check Japan's further aggressions by moving our entire licet to the Pacific when the conclusion of the war; eliminated the German licet in the At- 1 lantic. Since then we maintained our one-ocean navy in the Pacific, and this! proved adequate in both directions! only because the existence and deploy- ’ ment of the British Navy gave us secu- . rity in the Atlantic.

"In effect, we and the British Com-! monwealth actually had a two-ocean : navy, operated for a single, peaceful ; purpose. We still have a one-ocean > navy. We are building a two-ocean ■ navy, but it will not be completed s within six years. We need the com- j plete structure as fast as we can, be- ] cause the other part of our present: two-ocean navy is in grave danger. "The British Navy can survive only if the British Isles survive. Should the; British Isles fall we can only believe j that the British Navy, which never • runs from danger, will fall at the same; ] time. I think we can safely assume ■ ! that the British Navy will share the • I fate of the courageous nation that sup-; | ports it." COMPARISON OF FLEETS. i . I Colonel Knox quoted Navy Depart-! | ment estimates of the combined naval j I strength of the Axis as 585.000 tons in ; I excess of that of the United States.] ! The Axis at present had 658 warships; i and the United States 312. By Janui ary, 1942, the Axis would have 803' | warships compared with 324 of the i ! United States, and by January. 19-13.1 I it would have 962. compared with 422 ■American warships. "We need to build ships, trainj I crews, build bases, drill armies and, I accumulate war stores," Colonel Knox! i said. "Only Britain and her fleet can i I give us that time, ami they need our! help to survive. If we fully organise; iour metal and material resources we; I can give Britain that help and simul-; i taneously we can build a strong mili-; i tar.v defence. 'Die cost will be great.; ' but it will be far greater should we I I now stand by and lot Britain full. "With our unstinted help. I firmly! believe. Britain cannot be defeated.! i We will act in our own best national: I interests, therefore, if while incrcas-; ! ing our naval power as fast as we can I we provide the British Commonwealth j ‘with means to bring her through this, I iragic crisis." I j Questioned by Mr Hamilton Fish.; j whether the United States possessed i i the world’s greatest navy. Colonel; • Knox said that the navy was unques- • ■ tionably now the strongest in thei I world. He said he did not fear im- i .mediate attack, “but I know that .f Britain is defeated we will be at-1 • lacked." > i He said he would oppose any j ■ amendment preventing the use of .Amo-j ! rica.n si’,ip- to escort convoys became, j he did not believe in tying the United I I States’ hands in any way. However. he said, lie did not favour sending’ ; American convoys escorted by Ameri-i | can warships into the war zones. • 1 do not think wr can do anything: morale of the Brin.-b. ( .o<.ple thru : ,.a<s i this Bill." he added. | POSSIBILITY OF CRISIS. Questioned as to the possibility <•' .-. ! , crisi:; in GO to 90 days. Colonel Km x i intensified combined submarine and The Blit:.-!’, were ::n!,m i with tightIlmught tin Hr.’.. h Fie. ■..-... Li !•'. io the last “I in. >w \ Churchill. .md I can't imagim.- any 1 lie said. said. ■ ■ ti. ■ (' '. m K r ■ /:.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19410120.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 20 January 1941, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
767

SECURITY AT SEA Wairarapa Times-Age, 20 January 1941, Page 2

SECURITY AT SEA Wairarapa Times-Age, 20 January 1941, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert