Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESENTED BY JAPAN

BAN ON PETROL EXPORTS FROAI U.S.A. “AN UNFRIENDLY ACT.” THREAT OF INTERNATIONAL REPERCUSSIONS. (By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright) LONDON. August 1. An official spokesman in Tokio, commenting on the American ban on exports of aviation petrol, said that whatever might be President Roosevelt's pretext the move was without doubt taken with the object of bringing economic pressure on Japan. It was, he said, an unfriendly act and if pursued by the United States, was likely to lead to international repercussions. The spokesman added that the loss of United States oil supplies would not have any effect on Japanese military operations. BRITAIN’S POSITION LARGE STOCKS IN HAND. AND SUPPLIES AVAILABLE. LONDON. August 1. The “Daily Telegraph” says that the ban will not seriously affect Britain. In. the first eight months of the war America exported 800.000 barrels, of which Britain took slightly below 300.000. The petroleum expert. Dr Oscar Tokayer. said that the British stocks were very high and the quantity of aviation petrol at present being consumed was comparatively small. Stocks were available for many months. All the British requirements were epsily obtainable from the Dutch West Indies, which was now a British sphere of influence. Dr Tokayer said. A refinery for high-grade petrol was also being constructed in the Dutch East Indies. These supplies were payable in sterling, causing less strain on the Treasury than payments in dollars. The “Telegraph” says that Germany is handicapped by her limited quantity of high-grade fuel, the shortage of which is responsible for the German fighters failing to attain their claimed speeds. The ban, it states, affects Japan, because she is almost entirely dependent on American supplies. Little comment so far has been made in London on the ban (states British Official Wireless) as it is considered in official circles that such a step would be in accordance with America’s lattest policy of building up reserves of the most important commodities in case of an emergency.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19400802.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 2 August 1940, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
324

RESENTED BY JAPAN Wairarapa Times-Age, 2 August 1940, Page 5

RESENTED BY JAPAN Wairarapa Times-Age, 2 August 1940, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert