Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORK OF THE FLEET

SHOULD IT HAVE GONE TO OSLO? LORD HANKEY’S EXPLANATION. LOSS OF VALUABLE TRANSPORT. By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright. (Received This Day 10 a.m.) LONDON, May 8. Lord Hankey in the House of Lords, replying to a suggestion that the fleet ought to have gone to Oslo, said the fleet was chasing German ships to which it gave battle. It could not have gone to Oslo on that particular day. He suggested that one of our greatest losses was the torpedoing on April 20, of a ship loaded with anti-aircraft guns and valuable stores. This was the only transport sunk during the whole campaign.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19400509.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 9 May 1940, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
105

WORK OF THE FLEET Wairarapa Times-Age, 9 May 1940, Page 5

WORK OF THE FLEET Wairarapa Times-Age, 9 May 1940, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert