Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BATHS PROPOSAL

(To'the Editor.)

Sir, —Your correspondents “Ratepayer” and “Karroo” are obviously dominated by the thought of a probable lightening of their pockets if the Borough Council goes ahead with its plan to provide better swimming facilities in our town. Whilst I cannot claim to be a ratepayer and therefore perhaps am not competent to express an opinion on a financial matter of this kind, I do claim to be a citizen of the town and in my capacity as a citizen I endeavour to both take an interest in civic affairs and give some service to the town in return for the privilege of living in it. Both the' writers think that Masterton has plenty of baths and needs no more. They are both right—we do not need more baths, we need better baths. “Ratepayer” points out that there are at least six swimming pools in and around the town and again he is correct, but what he neglects to say is that only one of those pools in open to the general public and because that one is old, in poor repair and has inadequate dressing facilities only a small percentage of the public who would patronise a decent pool do attend this one. There is another pool available for the women only of Masterton. but I believe that it has now become something of a white elephant and is poorly patronised for the same reasons that make the Dixon Street Baths unpopular, though used for lack of anything better.

May I ask if “Ratepayer” and “Karroo” are interested in swimming or physical welfare? Have either of them been in the Dixon Street baths within the last three years? Have either of them children who are fond of swimming? The object of this letter is not criticism, but to make a plea to all ratepayers to take a long view of this baths question and not be blinded by the financial aspect to the exclusion of the physical welfare of a large proportion of Masterton's population. No citizen will deny that the problem of the town's water supply is of paramount importance, if for the moment we forget that the National war effort is the first consideration at present, but. very close behind comes the baths problem and if the council's desire to place the two question before the ratepayers is gone on with it is my sincere hope that they will vote in favour of both proposals and so bring this town into line with other New Zealand towns of its size in having both an adequate water supply and a decent swimming pool. I am, etc. CITIZEN. Masterton. January 27. 1940.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19400129.2.26.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 29 January 1940, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
446

THE BATHS PROPOSAL Wairarapa Times-Age, 29 January 1940, Page 4

THE BATHS PROPOSAL Wairarapa Times-Age, 29 January 1940, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert