Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR STRACHEY’S EXCLUSION

COMMENT IN NEW YORK APPARENT INCONSISTENCY By Telegraph—Press Association —Copyright. (Received This Day, 9.20 a.m.) NEW YORK, October 12. Mr John Strachey still denies that he is a Communist. The “New York Times” in an editorial, said: “The whole affair is puzzling to’thousands of Americans. We exclude a parlour Radical like Mr Strachey, while we keep a working Radical, who really means business, like the Australian-born Bridges.” It added: “Action contrary to Strachey ought to await a Supreme Court decision regarding Communism, the same as in the case of Bridges."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19381013.2.63

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 October 1938, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
93

MR STRACHEY’S EXCLUSION Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 October 1938, Page 7

MR STRACHEY’S EXCLUSION Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 October 1938, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert