Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PEOPLE’S HEALTH

SOCIAL SECURITY ACT “POOR STILL REMAIN POOR.” B.M.A. STATEMENT. (By Telegraph.—Special to the “Times-Age.”) WELLINGTON, This Day. In view of statements now being made on the hustings regarding the attitude of the medical profession to the general practitioner proposed under the Government’s Social Security Act and the tendency to mislead the public, the New Zealand branch of the British Medical Association issued a statement today clarifying the issue. “The New Zealand branch of the British Medical Association,” states the Association, “has been anxious for years past to provide a scheme which would result in a substantial improvement in the general health of the people, and has offered repeatedly to co-operate with the Government m bringing this about. Notwithstanding that it is a strictly professional and r.on-political body, that it represent 98 per cent of the members of the medical professidh practising in New Zealand and is the only body competent to advise the Government on the subject, and further that all its decisions on the subject have been unanimous—notwithstanding all these important factors the Government has turned a deaf ear to the united representations of the association and has preferred instead to act on the independent advice of a junior medical practitioner who is a meniber of the Government party. ASSOCIATION FLOUTED. “Although it is the., only body which can give effect to the Government’s proposal, and it was more politic in any case to seek its co-operation, the association was even denied the courtesy of seeing a copy of the Bill before it was presented to Parliament, and did hot in fact actually receive a copy until three hours after it had become public property. “The association knows of no case in which any professional, commercial or industrial body has been so deliberately flouted, and is still at a loss to understand why it should have been treated so, especially when it was so sincerely desirous of co-operating with the Government in achieving a scheme that would be really worth while and when the matter at issue was such a vital one as the general health and well-being of the men, women and children of this country. LOWERING STANDARDS. ' “The association regrets that it cannot see its way to co-operate in Carrying out the Government’s proposal for a general practitioner service because it conscientiously believes that the proposal as enacted can only result in the lowering of the standard of medical practice in New Zealand. Believing this, it would be wrong, obviously, for the association to assent to such a scheme, however well intentioned it might be. The position is unfortunate, but for this , the association cannot be held, to blame, “The' associaticrF believes that in its approach to the problem the Government is starting out on altogether wrotig lines. It ignores the principle that-prevention is better than cure, and that far more can be done for the improvement of the general health of the people and their consequent wellbeing and happiness by the improvement of existing housing and sanitary conditions, the elimination of known causes of disease and unfitness, the investigation of the unknown causes of these, and co-operation between the branches of preventive and curative medicine. Curative medicine in this country is already .singularly well provided for, and the association urges that a strongly preventive trend should be given to any such legislation as is proposed. “The Government's scheme will not raise the Standard of health. SERVICES. .“The. B.M.A. scheme which was turned down by the Government is based on the desire to ensure that the poorest person receives the same treatment es the richest person by providing them with, or assisting them to obtain, the things that are difficult to get. In other words, it plans a complete service for the limited section of the population which is unable to provide it for itself from its own resources. The Government’s scheme, on the other hand, is to ensure that the richest perron shall receive treatment no different from that obtainable by the poorest person, but shall pay a great deal more for it. In other words, it plans a partial service for all, irrespective of whether that service can be provided from people’s own resources or not. “The only reasons advanced on behalf of the Government for rejecting the limited B.M.A. scheme are that it is' ‘ a poor law system,’ ‘a pauperisation proposal,’ and ‘introduces discrimination.’ “The reply to this is that under the Government’s proposals the poor still remain poor. When the term ‘pauperisation’ is introduced it is not the B.M.A. which is responsible for the condition. Yet under the Government’s proposal, while the poor still remain poor, they will not receive the specialist services and treatment which the B.M.A. proposed they ■ should receive, and there will be no improvement in the general health of the people. EVOLUTIONARY METHODS URGED. “The association submits that the Government would have been better advised to have adopted the association’s scheme, which is limited, and. without upsetting or endangering present efficiency, meets the only need that requires to be met, leaving it for improvements to be made in the future as they are found to be necessary. The association maintains that improvement in the health services of the community should be of an evolutionary character, rather than that untried methods of unpredictable effect should be hastily introduced as is being done in the preseht instance.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19380927.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 27 September 1938, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
898

PEOPLE’S HEALTH Wairarapa Times-Age, 27 September 1938, Page 5

PEOPLE’S HEALTH Wairarapa Times-Age, 27 September 1938, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert