Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COSMETICS

GOOD FOR WOMEN. VIEWS OF HARLEY STREET DOCTOR. Dr William James O'Donovan, the Harley Street dermatologist, gave his opinion in a High Court case recently, in London that cosmetics were good for women. His reasons are: — Cosmetics clean the skin with less irritation than any soap.

Replace the grease in the skin that may be removed by too strenuous washing or be deficient through old age.

Act as a protection against the assault of wind and weather.

Provide a vehicle of colour that gives a great psychological tonic to Both sexes.

“It is right always to remember,” wrote Dr O’Donovan in "The Practitioner,” “the statement of Professor Sabouraud, of Paris, that he would almost prefer bad creams and bad cosmetics to none at all. “For he had noticed, as have others, that the skins of actresses as a class look younger than those of their contemporary sisters.” Dangers of skin irritation and disease through the use of beauty preparations have been grossly exaggerated.

Mrs Grundy still promises the modern girl an ugly old age through pores clogged with too much powder.

“That is nonsense,” a Harley Street specialist said. “It is impossible to clog up the pores of the skin. ’

“Cosmetics, as a rule, are extremely beneficial and the dangers are one in a million.

“The greatest care is taken by the makers of all cosmetics to eliminate any ingredient likely to be an irritant.

“Plucking |the eyebrows, however, should not be overdone in case it causes local inflammation.

“Don’t try to remove freckles. No freckle remover is known to the medical profession.

“Many of the skin troubles ascribed to the use of cosmetics are really due to over-exposure to the sun.” The verdict of Harley Street is that the money spent on cosmetics gives an adequate dividend in terms of health and fitness. !

Office girls in England spend an average of 3s a week on beauty; the mid-dle-class women about 7s; the society woman pays as much as £2 for a gilcS ed 2oz pot of face cream which any chemist would sell her under another name for 2s 6d over the counter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19380613.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 June 1938, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
355

COSMETICS Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 June 1938, Page 4

COSMETICS Wairarapa Times-Age, 13 June 1938, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert