RATING ON UNIMPROVED VALUES.
At the tiicuiinf' i f iliu Newcastle Ro'-d Board In hi ln.it Wcdn sd.iy ilie Cletk submitted a few example*. Growing hjol.' 1 .' iatcpHyi'irf wotiM !;u i IF ct-. d if rating on unimproved values were adopted. li w-Mild he uece.smry la shiku a into of 1 2 7!h din too .6 to Ring in th farm amount i f i;ue a< I;)' I lie proem sjste.n and thy fill-owing ta’■! ■• shows the re, nit in a few rcpr.sentaiivc cases: o a 9 9 o o M fi £ s (1 C R «1 Alf. Corbett ... S 2 0. Linnucr d 11 ,T. A. Gillctt Ilf G W. Fawkes 1 12 (i ]), Fullerton 7 5 S. Fullerton RJ ]1 W. A. P. Sutton .. 215 7 W. Hunt 2 12 11 11. Hinton 110 M. Fitzgerald .. .. 10 8 Laxou and Rothwcll ~ 1 3 9 Geo. Hall 17 10 Jane Blackett .. .. 13 G C. 11. Bycroft 16 1 F. Bloloch 1 8
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIGUS19011014.2.16
Bibliographic details
Waikato Argus, Volume XI, Issue 1072, 14 October 1901, Page 2
Word Count
163RATING ON UNIMPROVED VALUES. Waikato Argus, Volume XI, Issue 1072, 14 October 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in